Skip navigation

What Do You Do When Someone Steals Your Content

Blog writing tips and articlesHaving been the target of copyright thieves, and working with writers, authors, and photographers on copyright protection and laws for over 25 years, I thought I’d talk a little about what to do when someone steals your content.

First, you noticed that I didn’t say “if” someone steals your content. That was on purpose. With the glut of information on the Internet, it’s now a matter of “when” not “if”.

The first step in learning about what you can do when someone steals your content is to know that it will happen, so the more prepared and informed you are, the better your chances of prevention and having a plan in place when they steal.

As the number of websites and blogs grow, especially splogs, the demand for content puts more pressure on website administrators, who may resort to stealing content in order to fill space on their sites and attract traffic. Website hijacking, as such an example, is on the rise. This is the blatant use of part or all of your site’s content on another site without permission. This is also a copyright violation and needs to be dealt with accordingly.

Copyright laws were designed to protect those in society whom we celebrate and honor, often representative of the lowest paid workers, the artists. We don’t expect to take freely work from our doctors, lawyers, plumbers, electricians, mechanics, or others whose work we value and honor with compensation. We expect to pay them. And if we don’t, the collectors will come after us.

But there is something about a writer, poet, composer, and photographer that makes people expect their work needs no compensation. Just take it. Have we glamorized the “starving artist” notion so much, people think taking income producing content from them without compensation is okay? That a “link back” is credit enough for their hard work and expertise? Where did our society go wrong in that value judgment?

This is the first of three articles. This article covers tips, information and resources to help you deal with copyright infringement, the theft of your blog or website content. The second article includes helpful links and resources for finding stolen content and copyright infringements. The last article in the series examines the growing trends in content theft such as image hotlinking, website hijacking, and abusive use of feeds to replace original content without permission, as well as other copyright infringements on the rise.

At the end of this article, there are many links to more information to help you understand and confront copyright violations, as well as some WordPress Plugins that will help you post copyright notices on your blog and feed, as well as help you track and uncover copyright violations.

Confronting Content Theft

If your wallet, car, or purse is stolen, or your home robbed, you have the police, security, and insurance companies to call to help you recover your goods and get compensation. If your content is stolen, who can you turn to for help and aid?

Unfortunately, until an agency is established to defend your creative rights, most of the fight is up to you. Don’t be overwhelmed by the thought. I hope to make the process of recovering your stolen material simple to understand and easy to implement.

The second step in dealing with content theft is clearing up some major myths about copyright, copyright violations, and the Internet.

  • Going after someone for theft and copyright violation is NOT time consuming or expensive.
  • It does NOT require a lawyer.
  • It might NOT require anything other than some simple actions.
  • The protection of copyright laws should NOT be left to the “companies with the money”.
  • Protecting and defending copyrights is NOT complicated.
  • WRONG: The companies with money think nothing of violating copyrights, so there is nothing to do about it.
  • WRONG: Everything on the Internet is/should be free.
  • WRONG: You put it on the Internet, what do you expect?

Don’t understand what is and is not copyright protected and how it works? Check out Introduction to Copyrights and 10 Big Myths About Copyright Explained. Also check out the Copyright Crash Course.

Just because information is on the Internet does not mean it’s “free” to take and steal. Information, images, graphics, designs, and photographs, all are protected under copyright laws and are known as intellectual property. While it is nice to think that everything on the Internet is or should be free, for the most part it is. It is free to read, look at, wonder about, and even write about. It is not free to steal, make money from it, or use it as your own.

As for the cost and trouble of tracking down and stopping content and intellectual property theft, let’s look at who the thief is. Someone who steals your content, be it writing, image, graphics, or photography, is often a single person (not business) doing something they haven’t yet been spanked for, so they think it’s alright to do. They are not rich. They are often not very smart.

Understand stealing content is illegal, be it photos or writing. By going after someone for stealing your content, you are protecting the millions of others who let it slide. It is important that we all get educated and know what to do when someone steals our content, and we need to teach others that this is wrong - very wrong and very illegal. If we all work together, hopefully there will be no more ignorance and everyone will be smart about copyrights. Original content will be respected and protected.

If the issue of people stealing your content doesn’t bother you, be sure and mark your website or blog accordingly with a copyright tag that says “help yourself”. Display a copyright notice, like one from , that says “free for the taking”.

If it does bother you, you can display a copyright policy notice to inform your readers that your content is yours - don’t touch. Or you can choose another copyright policy that says something between. Check out all the different copyright options at Creative Commons. They also feature small logos, like the one in the sidebar here, which designates which rights users have to use your content.

Usually the issue of content theft is over before it is even started with a simple email advising them of the theft. Unfortunately, the myths keep people from taking action to protect their copyrights - and in turn, this perpetuates the myth that nothing will happen if you steal.

I will cover the following topics and issues on what to do when someone steals your content:

Tracking Down the Source and Taking Action

Once you find your content has been stolen, you need to track down the source of the theft. The source of the theft is who stole it in the first place. If one person steals some of your writing, someone else may either steal it from them, or link to it as if it was the source. With links and copies of the stolen material spread around, it can be confusing to find out where the source of the initial theft was, as well as tracking down all the links to that source.

If you find that others are linking to the stolen material as if it is the source, then contact that website owner or administrator (often called the webmaster) and let them know you are the original source of the information and ask that they change their link to your site with the original content. They will often post a correction, stating that their link was in error and point out that the others stole the content or misrepresented themselves.

However, finding who the original thief is and how to contact them can be a bit more of a challenge. A lot of blogs and websites are anonymous, with little or no information about the web owner, administrator, designer, or host. Still, with a little work and information, you can find the contact information. Check the following locations and resources:

  • Contact Page
  • About Page
  • Credit Page
  • Footer notes
  • Author Page
  • In the web page source code meta tags
  • Email links in the page source code (search for “mailto”)
  • Email forms

One you have a contact name, address, or email, you can then take the next step. The following are some resources for tracking down site ownership and contact information. Even if you can just find a name or business name, you can then use the directories to track down a mailing or email address.


Contact the Thief

Once you have identified the thief, the first step is to contact them. It’s critical to let them know that they have done wrong and that you know about it. Your goal in contacting the thief directly is to:

  • Inform them of the theft
  • Request removal, correction, modification, and/or compensation
  • Open a dialog
  • Gather information
  • Create a paper trail of evidence

Keep professional at all times. Begin your confrontation with the content thief calmly and carefully. Some people steal outright and don’t care, and it is instinctive to want to hurt them back, but don’t. Keep this professional, even if the response you get is unprofessional. You be the bigger person.

Some people don’t even know they are stealing your content for a variety of reasons. Give them a chance to explain and change their ways, and to remove the content before you start threatening. Remain professional and this might be quickly solved.

While many people want to immediately use their big guns, I seriously recommend a nice simple email or letter that says basically the following, and sent to every contact address or email you can find:

This is to advise you that you are using copyrighted and protected material on your website/blog. Your illegal use of XXXX article at XXXURLXXX is originally from my website/blog called XXTITLEXXX at XXXURLXXX. This is original content and I am the author and copyright holder. Use of copyright protected material without permission is illegal under copyright laws.

Please take one or more of the following actions immediately:

  • Re-write the post to include excerpts with a link to the original content.
  • Credit the material specifically to me, as author, and my website [be specific].
  • Provide compensation for use of my copyright protected material of $XX.00 USD paid via [payment method].
  • Remove the plagiarized material immediately.

I expect a response within 5 days to this issue. Thank you for your immediate action on this matter.

The response can come in many forms. I’ve received responses from people who immediately removed the content with an apology, admitting that they just liked the material and didn’t know they were doing wrong.

One person apologized for their ignorance of the law, then went on to tell me how disrespectful and ungracious I was because she’d posted what I’d written for a friend dying of cancer to cheer him up. I’m sorry about her friend, but theft is theft. If she had asked, I might have said yes, but stealing is still illegal, no excuses. Making me feel guilty for confronting the theft isn’t my problem. It is your problem.

As a website owner, manager, maintainer, or administrator, know the rules and law protecting not only the rights of others, but your rights for your own original content.

Gather Information and Evidence

Once you have contacted them, you wait. The response may be immediate or it may never come. While you wait, you take action.

Gather information: Compile all the information you have from your search to identify the source. Put it all together in a file folder on your computer, including correspondence. Make backup copies, just in case.

Create a paper trail: By gathering the information and saving it onto your computer (with backups and printed copies), you are starting a paper trail of evidence that might be used in the future if needed. It also will help you learn about what worked and didn’t work when the next copyright infringement happens. Print out copies of every piece of evidence. Include screen captures using graphics programs of file dates, samples, and examples. Put these all together in a folder as ammunition.

DO NOT SEEK REVENGE: Spamming, publicizing, or abusing the content thief will only bring suffering back to you. Stay professional. Defacing someone’s website, targeted spamming, and even publicizing the copyright violation can lead to criminal and legal action being taken against you. Even if legal action is not brought against you, your reputation may be ruined by such attacks. Be professional. There is a time and place for public outcries. The beginning of the process is not the time to go public.

Establish ownership: You need to be ready to prove that you are the owner of the material in question, so start gathering the proof you may need to prove you are the original owner and the copyright owner. Prepare as many of the following as possible:

  • Search Google and screen capture the results showing the original cache file with the date on it showing when it was spidered.
  • Print out a copy with the posted date visible.
  • Create a screen capture of your MySQL database record with the original post date information.
  • Print document information from a word processor of the history of the document (if written in a word processor).
  • Screen capture or print copies of dated comments made in response to the original posting.
  • Compile copies of notes with dates you may have made in preparing the document or images.
  • Create copies of the original, unedited images with the file date.
  • Get a notarized copy of the image or article.
  • Establish proof of registration with the Copyright Office
  • Find witnesses who read your site consistently and will testify to the date of post.
  • Comparisons their site pages’ source code with yours to document exactly how much of your content was stolen, including code. Mark it clearly on the printed copies.
  • Go through your backup copies of your website and website database to find the oldest copy you can with the stolen material in it.
  • Visit Archive - Way Back Machine, part of The Archive, to find past views of your site, possibly highlighting the stolen content.

Register Your Copyright: While your content and images are copyrighted upon completion, that copyright protection is limited. Think prevention now and take time to register your copyrighted material. For more information on how to register your original content, see Registering Your Copyrighted Material in this article series.

Be prepared for resistance: Be aware that there are also form letters available to counter your claim of copyright infringement. One example, Do-It-Yourself Counter Notification Letter, outlines a very specific legalize rebuttal. Part of preparing yourself for tackling copyright infringement and theft is to know thy enemy.

Wait the full 5 days for a response and if you get none, then you can step things up by sending a Cease and Desist Order.


Cease and Desist Order

A Cease and Desist Order is just a form letter with legalize that says “Stop or Else”. Also known as a C&D, there are many templates found on the web, with examples listed below. Find one that meets your needs and customize it for your specifics.

A Cease and Desist Order is a definite step up in implied threat for action. Accordingly, instead of waiting another 5 days, I recommend you shorten the time to respond to 24 to 36 hours. A Cease and Desist Order means business, and it means business now.

While your first contact letter should go to the party directly involved, a Cease and Desist Order might be worth sending to everyone involved. If you have enough information to realize that the individual won’t respond, consider sending the Cease and Desist Order to every contact you can find related to the website, including the website server host and advertisers, to make sure that all parties get a chance to see it.

Usually this legal looking document with a threat of monetary damages does the job. If it does not, then definitely contact the host server with the Cease and Desist Order, advising them to shut down the site if action to comply with the Cease and Desist Order is not seriously. Most hosts will jump to avoid such actions and will temporarily suspend the site. On occasion, you may find that the host server isn’t the “parent” host, but part of a shared host service. Keep following the breadcrumbs up to the parent company who runs the server.

A Cease and Desist Order can consist of some or all of the following:

  • Notification of the copyright infringement and theft of intellectual property.
  • A demand that they cease and desist from infringing your copyrights.
  • A clear time table for response and deadline.
  • Specific request to remove or destroy the page with the stolen content, or another move that will satisfy your need to have the theft stopped or controlled.
  • Inform them that they are liable for any and all attorney’s feeds, court costs, and damages (only valid for registered copyrighted work - so register your work now.)
  • Inform them of any intentions you have to send copies of this Cease and Desist Order to their ISP, host, advertisers to let them know of the infringement.
  • Clearly state you will take further legal action is this is not resolved to your satisfaction by the deadline.
  • If you want, reinforce your statements with the contact information of your lawyer.
  • Request for identities and URLs of all links to the stolen content.
  • Demand for an accounting of all profits and income derived from use of the infringed content.
  • Demand for compensation for any and all profits and income derived from the copyright theft.
  • Demand for compensation due to lost profits, income, and reputation.
  • Clearly state how they are to respond to you regarding this action, by phone, email, in writing (mail), and if they are to respond directly to you or to your legal representative or lawyer.

Make the letter or email as official looking as possible. If your logo is cute and cartoon-like, create a new, professional looking style just for the serious nature of this letter. For emailed Cease and Desist Orders, make them simple, clear, and easy to read, with double spacing between paragraphs and a clear title. Do not use background art or stationery. Make it look like a memorandum.

If this doesn’t work, which it usually does, then it’s time to take bigger steps. The following will help you learn more about Cease and Desist Orders.


Contact Their Advertisers

Advertisers (most of them) want to do business with reputable people and companies. They want to know that their advertising is being used in the right way and for the right reasons, attracting the right customers. If the initial contact and Cease and Desist Order doesn’t resolve the matter, then it’s time to get really serious. Hit the content theft abuser in the pocket book and let their advertisers know that their ads are being showcased with illegally used content.

Send advertisers a letter or email outlining the specific copyright violations and copies of your requests to stop and the Cease and Desist Order. Don’t just send the Cease and Desist alone. It won’t carry much weight as a third party, but a letter describing your attempts with copies of the ignored and disobey order is usually enough to convince them to pull all advertising contracts with the abuser. In some cases, they have more information about the thief than you do, so they may even take steps to inform them and their host server, doing part of the work for you.

Don’t start with the advertisers. You need to go through the other motions to build a case against the content theft that you can show to the advertisers. But when they see it, expect immediate action.

And if that doesn’t work, then it’s time to call in the big guns and request their removal from search engines and that the search engines take their own actions.


Request a Ban from Search Engines - The Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 (DMCA) was created as an act which:

…criminalizes production and dissemination of technology that can circumvent measures taken to protect copyright, not merely infringement of copyright itself, and heightens the penalties for copyright infringement on the Internet.

Okay, so what does that really mean?

While not perfect, DMCA Title II states:

[The DMCA] creates a safe harbor for online service providers (OSPs, including ISPs) against copyright liability if they promptly block access if they receive a notification from a copyright holder or their agent.

This means that if you contact the online service provider, including search engines, they are compelled to work for you to stop the copyright infringement and violation.

According to Google’s DMCA statement:

It is our policy to respond to notices of alleged infringement that comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and other applicable intellectual property laws, which may include removing or disabling access to material claimed to be the subject of infringing activity. If we remove or disable access to comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, we will make a good-faith attempt to contact the owner or administrator of each affected site so that they may make a counter notification pursuant to sections 512(g)(2) and (3) of that Act.

To take action, Google recommends:

  • Identify in sufficient detail the copyrighted work that you believe has been infringed.
  • Identify the material that you claim is infringing the copyrighted work listed in item #1 above.
  • Provide information reasonably sufficient to permit Google to contact you (email address is preferred).
  • Provide information, if possible, sufficient to permit Google to notify the owner/administrator of the web page that allegedly contains infringing material (email address is preferred).
  • Include the following statement: “I have a good faith belief that use of the copyrighted materials described above on the allegedly infringing web pages is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.”
  • Include the following statement: “I swear, under penalty of perjury, that the information in the notification is accurate and that I am the copyright owner or am authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.”

If you have been following my instructions, you would have most of that information. Do not do this lightly. In general, once a complaint has been filed, the site owner has little or no opportunity to respond or resist. While they try to put safe guards in place, search engines don’t have time nor interest in “helping”, only taking action. This is very serious action, and it can also be against you if you offend someone who files a similar complaint. Use this only as a last resort and only with clear and obvious evidence of violations.

The following is information on contacting search engines and services directly.


Register Your Copyrights: Prevention is Protection

If copyright infringement and protection is something that worries you, take the time right now to make sure you have a copyright notice on your blog. It doesn’t have to be on every page, but it does need to be prominently displayed somewhere. Some people include a specific Page called “Copyright” or post the copyright notice on their About Page. You can also include a copyright notice in the footer of every page.

If you are really worried, consider registering your writing and photography with the US Copyright Office. You can submit multiple articles or photographs in a single registration as a “collection” with one title for the entire collection, if certain conditions are met.

Fill out the appropriate form(s) for registering a collection of unpublished works and follow the instructions for registering your copyright, with careful note of the instructions for registering a collection. The collection registration submission requires the first and last 25 pages printed out, but the entire collection can be on CD-ROM as long as the files are in a common format such as HTML, doc, txt, pdf, or rtf.

New! The US Copyright Office has started a beta program for digital filing. If you would like to participate and help this program develop, check out the Copyright Office Beta Digital Program Announcement.

You don’t have to register your copyrighted material but it helps in a court of law, if it ever gets to that point. The cost is minimal and is good protection. According to the Copyright Office, registrations made before or within 5 years of publication will “establish prima facie evidence in court of the validity of the copyright and of the facts stated in the certificate” and if made 3 months “after publication of the work or prior to an infringement of the work, statutory damages and attorney’s fees will be available to the copyright owner in court actions. Otherwise, only an award of actual damages and profits is available to the copyright owner.” While the courts or lawyers might change their mind on this, this is the policy.


More Information on Copyright Laws, Intellectual Property Laws, and Content Theft Prevention

This is just a brief introduction to your options when deciding what to do when someone steals your content. For more information on content theft, legal rights, copyright, intellectual property laws, licensing, permissions, and prevention, I’ve included a list of resources to help.

Legal Topics, Copyright, Intellectual Property Laws, and Licensing

Content Theft Commentaries

WordPress Help With Copyright Issues

Related Articles

Stop Content Theft Badges

Member of the 9Rules Blogging Network


Site Search Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Feed on Lorelle on WordPress Subscribe Feedburner iconVia Feedburner Subscribe by Email

Copyright Lorelle VanFossen, member of the 9Rules Network, and author of Blogging Tips, What Bloggers Won't Tell You About Blogging.

221 Comments

  1. Posted April 11, 2006 at 1:53 am | Permalink

    I have been wondering how to deal with it. Thanks for the article with thorough information.

  2. Posted April 11, 2006 at 11:50 am | Permalink

    First off, thank you very much for this very interesting guide and for the link to my side. I’m very glad to see people helping others deal with copyright infringement in a productive way.

    I was especially glad to see you encourage people to remain professional as the worst advice I see consistently involves publicizing and shaming as the first steps. While it can play a part in an effective strategy, it’s certainly not a way to close a case.

    However, I did notice an interesting omission in this guide: Sending DMCA notices to hosts.

    Though you mention sending a DMCA notice to Google, the same procedure can be used to send notice to the person’s host and have them forcibly remove the offending work. The DMCA notice and take down provision resolves about 75% of my plagiarism cases with C&D letters making up the rest.

    If you want more information on sending DMCA notices to hosts, I have information regarding it on my site here: http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/?page_id=61

    Thank you again for the article. I hope it helps some people in need.

  3. anonymous
    Posted April 11, 2006 at 1:42 pm | Permalink

    Of course, if the Orphan Works amendment to the 1976 Copyright Act passes, all of the above recourse, including registration with the U.S. Copyright Office in order to protect one’s work, will be moot.

  4. Posted April 11, 2006 at 2:40 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for the link and emphasizing that the DMCA can work directly with hosts. And thanks for being part of the catalyst to help me write this article. We need to talk about this. The more we talk about it, hopefully, the more people will know what to do, and what NOT to do when it comes to protecting our copyrighted materials.

  5. Posted April 12, 2006 at 11:38 am | Permalink

    That’s a great article. I’m going to put it on my website because other people need to read it.

  6. derek
    Posted April 12, 2006 at 9:48 pm | Permalink

    GEt a clue man if you place your stuff on the net its free!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  7. Stephen
    Posted April 12, 2006 at 10:06 pm | Permalink

    Sorry about derek - chances are he’s one of the morons who trolls digg trying to sound intelligent. As for digg - your story appeared on the front page of digg.com - congratulations :) http://www.digg.com/design/What_Do_You_Do_When_Someone_Steals_Your_Content.

  8. Posted April 12, 2006 at 10:19 pm | Permalink

    Cool stuff. There really ought to be a better form of protection though, threatening to get their site removed from search engines doesnt exactly cut it in my book.

  9. Posted April 12, 2006 at 10:45 pm | Permalink

    Great article :) If you want more information on filing a DMCA notice, I wrote an extensive article on it at http://www.danrichard.com/2006/03/21/dmca-action-a-general-guide-to-taking-action-against-site-rippers-using-dmca-law/

    Dan

  10. JH
    Posted April 13, 2006 at 12:42 am | Permalink

    Would quoting one or two paragraphs, formatted in blockquotes, of an article and linking to that article and website be considered a copyright voliation?

  11. Posted April 13, 2006 at 12:44 am | Permalink

    Great article. Although I think the ‘first contact email’ example is a little bit harsh. I would send something more ‘casual’ (depending on the site that ’stole’ the piece), sort of: “Hey, I happened to stumble upon your website and found some text that belongs to my website at example.com. That is a copyrighted work I have there, and you should have checked with me first to publish it in your own website.” and then, depending on your permissiveness (is that a word?):

    1. “Please remove the content from your website, and if you are interested, just put a link to my site”.
    Or
    2. “Please, put a link at the beggining of the document stating that the original is from example.com by Robert Calfer”.
    If the thief (now without braces) knows exactly what he/she’s doing, don’t hesitate to follow the more severe guidelines.

    Great article! I digg it!

  12. Posted April 13, 2006 at 12:59 am | Permalink

    There’s a search engine called Copyscape, which can locate webpages/sites that may have copied your content.

    http://www.copyscape.com/

  13. Posted April 13, 2006 at 1:30 am | Permalink

    JH: Quoting and citing material is not theft. Especially if it is cited with a link and credit to the original source. In these cases, only excerpts are typically used, not the entire article.

    Stephen: Thanks for the heads up. I’ve been traveling and am now just catching on to what everyone else is obviously catching onto as well. Weeee! I got a lot of email and comments to pour through, and I’m still traveling. Yikes.

  14. AB
    Posted April 13, 2006 at 2:07 am | Permalink

    I wrote about these issues just last month:
    http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/text/copyright

    I was inspired by the 10 Copyright Myths that you link to, but thought it needed a more in depth dicussion to direct questions and real-life examples. Sadly C&Ds don’t always work as many people who steal on a regular basis ignore these and authors don’t seem to take much action after the C&D fails.

    Your article has soon good tips in addition dispelling myths. Good work.

  15. Posted April 13, 2006 at 3:41 am | Permalink

    This is an excellent article. I’m quite inspired after reading it now, and willing to put up contents that I feel is of valuable sources to many others.

    I have several mathematical source codes and algorithms which may be really helpful to the community, but yet I am afraid of codes being stolen and used without proper credits.

    Good article!

  16. Posted April 13, 2006 at 6:29 am | Permalink

    This was a very helpful article, thank you for writing it.

  17. Posted April 13, 2006 at 6:39 am | Permalink

    Great article. I think I’ll put it on my site as a warning to others.

  18. Posted April 13, 2006 at 6:42 am | Permalink

    Stealing is an inaccurate word to use here - perhaps ‘copyright infringement’, ‘unauthorized reproduction’, or ‘plaugarism’?

    Otherwise a nicely written piece.

  19. Dave
    Posted April 13, 2006 at 7:15 am | Permalink

    What about your blatant copy of website design from http://www.mertner.com???

  20. Posted April 13, 2006 at 7:19 am | Permalink

    Nice tips, and thanks for the direct links for support. Saves a lot of tracking down information since you consolodated it already.

  21. Posted April 13, 2006 at 7:22 am | Permalink

    Good article, good level of detail, so I post a manual Trackback: Linksammlung zu Copyright und Copyright Infringement.

  22. Posted April 13, 2006 at 7:30 am | Permalink

    Steve and David,

    These results are from dictionary.com

    Thief: One who steals, especially by stealth.
    Steal: To take (the property of another) without right or permission.

    There is no mention in either case of the intention to deprive the owner of an object. If someone steals my car and returns it a short while later, they still stole it and they are still a thief. They didn’t intend to deprive me of it, I might have even been asleep when it happened, but the law will still call them a thief and prosecute accordingly.

    Also, if you actually take the time to read copyright law, you’ll see that copyright infringement IS a crime. For proof of that, just pop in the nearest U.S. DVD and read the FBI warning or visit these links:

    http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/17usc506.htm
    http://www.copyright.gov/legislation/dmca.pdf (Skip down to “Remedies” on page seven and you’ll see that it’s an offense punishable by up to five years imprisonment)

    Copyright is an element of intellectual property, emphasis on the word property. Copyright guarantees you a set of exclusive rights to a work including to reproduce, perform or make derivative works based upon the original. When someone violates that, they steal, or if you prefer, deprive, that right from the person who holds the copyright.

    It is entirely possible to steal immaterial things. I can steal your freedom, your right to privacy and countless other intangible things you enjoy. Infringing copyright is no different, it is stealing a right granted by the Constitution (Article 1, section 8) and not wanting to call it theft doesn’t change what it is.

    Personally though, I find it pointless to sit here and argue semantics when a much larger issue is at stake. There is a very real need for a dialog on this subject and arguing about definitions is merely avoiding the issue.

  23. Posted April 13, 2006 at 7:44 am | Permalink

    As a side note to the matter. If we are to believe copyright infringement isn’t theft, then why was the 1997 amendment to copyright law entitled the “No Electronic Theft” act?

    http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/iclp/hr2265.html

    A similar act in 1999 was entitled “The Digital Theft Deterrence and Copyright Damages Improvement Act”

    http://www.bsa.org/usa/press/newsreleases/Statutory-Damages-Bill-Signed-into-Law.cfm

    The government seems to have no problem calling copyright infringement theft…

  24. Posted April 13, 2006 at 9:39 am | Permalink

    For more information on the various licenses and copyright protections ranging from “all rights reserved” to “no rights reserved”, see Creative Commons in addition to the links above.

    The purpose of this article is to inform and educate. Whether or not you choose to chase down and stop any content thieves, and they are thieves no matter what game you want to play with semantics, is up to you. Either way, the law is the law and not a wish. If you don’t believe it, then spend some time with some photographers, authors, movie writers and directors and producers, and a wide range of artists who do this for a living and have to fight for the ownership of their property from those who steal as well as those who say they stole. It’s an education.

  25. Tom
    Posted April 13, 2006 at 9:50 am | Permalink

    Fantastic. I can’t thank you enough.

  26. Wesley Shephard
    Posted April 13, 2006 at 10:59 am | Permalink

    The government calling copyright infringement theft doesn’t mean anything as far as the legal definition of theft. If you go to court claiming that your works were stolen, that there was theft, technically you are telling them that someone appropriated the physical embodiment of your works. You can steal a physical DVD, but the information on the DVD when copied is copyright infringement.

    The courts are quite aware of the incorrect usage of the legal terms, and even make some accommodation for people who use the terms incorrectly, but woe to those who actually make such a mistake in a legal document itself. Legal words have specific meanings that sometimes are counterintuitive and even opposite of “traditional” use. It is that way in most technical fields (the use of a technical language). Even though law uses something that looks like English, if you only understand it at that level, you will be misinformed quite often.

    At the end of the day, while using the terms theft/steal to refer infringement may communicate well with the masses your intent, to those who used the terms in the technical sense, it sounds uneducated. I stopped reading after a while because anyone who misuses the terms so badly couldn’t really have a deep understanding of the issues from a legal perspective. There are in fact misstatements on this page, but since I’m not your lawyer, I can not comment on them.

  27. Posted April 13, 2006 at 11:02 am | Permalink

    Wesley,

    Just one thought: This isn’t a legal document.

  28. Posted April 13, 2006 at 11:06 am | Permalink

    Sorry, but the RIAA have been calling out all these people in the US for “stealing music” among other legally correct statements you seem so hellbent on, and they seem to be winning most of their cases and not getting counter-sued for libel.

    Dan

  29. Posted April 13, 2006 at 11:12 am | Permalink

    Oops… ended that too fast.

    I wanted to know if there is a difference, or is it just a matter of the RIAA going nuts with a huge legal department budget?

    Dan

  30. Posted April 13, 2006 at 12:32 pm | Permalink

    this is great. thanks for all this info.

  31. Posted April 13, 2006 at 3:01 pm | Permalink

    nobody will take my stupid content
    it has no value
    it’s stupid and incredibly lame
    I thought maybe I’d just cry stop it when it happened

    interesting information, thanks for such informative content
    people like you keep us coming back looking, lurking

  32. Posted April 13, 2006 at 5:22 pm | Permalink

    i haven’t read it all, but I will read it tomorrow as I’ll have more time, I just wanted to tell you that this is the very first time I see such post. Wonderfull!!! this is just amazing! congratulations!!

  33. Posted April 13, 2006 at 5:39 pm | Permalink

    Thank you for writing this. Very informative.

    I’ve had this happen to me…twice. Luckily both bloggers removed my material immediately.

  34. Posted April 13, 2006 at 6:58 pm | Permalink

    Great article, although not as simple as the three-step method for stealing content ( ctrl A ctrl C ctrl V )

  35. Posted April 13, 2006 at 9:39 pm | Permalink

    Excellent article Lorelle! Thanks for putting so much time and thought into all of your content.

  36. Posted April 13, 2006 at 11:51 pm | Permalink

    wow, informitive and freaking awsome! Thanks…. now i just hope no one steels my sweet review of Battle Pope.

    this one is going in my favorites

  37. Posted April 14, 2006 at 5:05 am | Permalink

    Great article - I have a worse case scenario where the alleged violation has been ripped off from my book - before I ever released a digital copy.

    The website uses 100 quotes from the book, often word for word, then change 10 around and call it a n “online test”.

    They do not attribute me or the publisher nor suggest where the book can be bought - nor did they seek permission. In addition to this they charge $109 bucks for the “course” that goes with the “online test” - the book is only $9.95 or so (less now - it was published in 2000) - so they are making a huge profit from ripping off my content. I’d really like to know if they are providing a photocopy of the book as well - it wouldn’t surprise me.

    It’s not just me - their “online course” list contains several books which I am sure the authors and/or publishershave not authorised their content to be used in this manner.

    Right now I am waiting for my publisher to tell me what is going on - but if they fail to do anything then I will follow the instructions here - publicly - because “name and shame” could well work better than any legal threats. These people appear to be pillars of the local community and I wonder how their neigbours would feel if everyone knew that they were suspected of copyright violation theft?

  38. Posted April 14, 2006 at 8:42 am | Permalink

    It’s a good article, but in a lot of cases unless you would seriously be making a loss over it I personally do not think it’s worth the hassle to even try and stop it. It happens a lot that content from one site gets ripped to another and as you stated in the article, it hardly ends with just 1 copy. When something even gets copied, it’s something good, within no time an entire load of sites will be hosting that information or article.

    Trying to trace it back will take a lot more time than most people will be wanting to spend on it.

  39. Posted April 14, 2006 at 11:00 am | Permalink

    Lorelle, We always enjoy your website and your articles. They are well written, researched, and address topics of interest and current concerns. Excellent article, appreciate your thorough take on the issue, got a chuckle reading the psuedo intellect who spent what would have been valuable time for the rest of us, debating the use of the words stealing vs infringement - GET A LIFE.

  40. Posted April 14, 2006 at 12:52 pm | Permalink

    As someone who has had my orignial images of my own artwork (http://www.lampwork.net/) stolen from a website overseas (http://www.ctekloflower.ru/bizuter_5.htm) and used for fraudluent sales, I can honestly way that your article is incredibly useful. Thank you from the bottom of my heart.

  41. Posted April 14, 2006 at 8:55 pm | Permalink

    thank you. your effort and time spent doing this is greatly appreciated, as i speak for those like me who fear of people stealing art, poety, and whatnot. thank you

    -kayla

  42. Posted April 15, 2006 at 11:44 am | Permalink

    Wow great article. I’ll remember to come back to this if it ever happens. Hopefully it won’t :)

  43. Posted April 19, 2006 at 3:36 pm | Permalink

    I’m curious as to whether or not it’s considered “stolen” when someone uses your articles without asking first, but links to you and says it’s yours?

  44. Posted April 19, 2006 at 4:28 pm | Permalink

    If you wonder, check this out from Confessional Poet:

    Now it’s like…what do I do?!?!? Monday night I literally was lying there, unable to sleep, cringing thinking about all the stuff I’ve put out there that someone could steal…that someone could probably get published and make money from…and if that happened, how could I even prove it was mine? At one point I had resolved to just delete all my blogs. Now I’m thinking of deleting the old ones (and making hard copies for myself; I have all the files saved anyway). But what would that really accomplish, as long as I’m still supplying the wilds of the Internet with my fresh, vulnerable content?

    You can play semantics all you want. If they are using your work without permission, your entire work outside of Fair Use…call it what you will, it’s still illegal.

  45. Posted April 20, 2006 at 8:19 am | Permalink

    goddess, that would probably depend on the copyright you claim/hold on the articles, I guess - It is a rather common practice on blogs to publish part of the source and attribute it to the author, isnt it?

  46. Posted April 21, 2006 at 3:58 pm | Permalink

    Thanks, Sukhi. And I wasn’t playing semantics, I was trying to understand if there was a difference between taking and giving credit or just taking and using it as your own, Lorelle.

  47. Posted April 23, 2006 at 7:22 am | Permalink

    Thank you for these articles. Very useful for writers and artists.

  48. Posted April 26, 2006 at 12:10 am | Permalink

    Goddess, you might not be, which is great as it is important to understand the difference, but a LOT of people are, so the comment was directed to the whole, not the individual.

  49. Posted April 26, 2006 at 8:59 am | Permalink

    Ok, Lorelle, because I honestly wasn’t clear if the person could legally use your work IF they credited you outright because I see magazine articles in which people quote a line or two of someone’s book and it seems to be an ok thing to do without permission as long as the person is credited. I’ve read that quoting a line or two is legally permissible and that makes the issue rather confusing.

    I’m find all of this very interesting in light of the situation now playing out with Kaavya Viswanathan.

  50. Posted April 28, 2006 at 4:58 am | Permalink

    I’m writing an article about that, and yours are a great source of info. Will link to here when it’s finished. Also, a low-life stole entire articles from my site, including the HTML. I wrote him, he removed my comment asking for action. A lot of friends did the same. The guy blocked comments in his blog. He’s even pointing to files at my own server. Stealing MY bandwidth.

    Blogger.com was not very helpful, so I decided to be NOT professional, replaced the images with VERY offending images. Google Images can be very nasty with filters off. When his mother visits the site, he’ll think twice before stealing other’s content.

  51. teresa
    Posted May 1, 2006 at 1:35 am | Permalink

    but when you no longer have control over your own computer & cant even acess your own settings because you have been blocked out or you cant control your own firewall or some internet sites are blocked or your email is stolen or use your email without your consent what do you do then.

  52. Posted May 1, 2006 at 7:55 am | Permalink

    Teresa: You turn to information and experts on viruses and computer security, a totally different subject from this. It’s terrible. It is just not the same issue as having someone violate your copyrights. I wish the laws were harder on both types of criminals, though.

  53. Posted May 4, 2006 at 5:50 am | Permalink

    This is a great article, thanks.

  54. Coronakwl
    Posted May 16, 2006 at 6:02 pm | Permalink

    My original artwork was stolen off a gallery website and used as an illustration in a document. The author of this booklet never responded to me. I even found his business address and stopped by (this was local). I thought I had a case to sue him since it was a product he was selling using a booklet with MY illustration. My legal counsel told me to forget it because any damages would be limited to a portion of the proceeds this guy got from any sales resulting from the use of the document to sell the product, i.e. it would be very hard to prove how much and how significant the use of my illustration was in making sales. Thus, he used my illustration for free for a couple of years and I got nothing.

  55. Marcus
    Posted May 17, 2006 at 8:54 am | Permalink

    > My original artwork was [copied without permission] off a gallery website and used as an illustration in a
    > document. [...] I thought I had a case to sue him [...]
    > Thus, he used my illustration for free for a couple of years and I got nothing.

    And how much would you estimate your “damages” were? I.e., how much more money/fame/whatever would you have gotten if he didn’t use a copy of your illustration like he did?
    Or more specifically, were the damages more than tiny, or are you just one of those ultra-egoistic assholes who would put a fence around a flower on his/her yard not because passers-by looking at it is annoying in itself but only because otherwise those passers-by could get something positive (warm, fuzzy, happy feelings, perhaps) from your property without you getting anything in return?

  56. Shubha
    Posted May 17, 2006 at 9:14 am | Permalink

    I do not have a copyright of the content published on my website. However, I do not want anybody to steal the content. I have just seen one of our competitors stealing the entire website design and the content from my website. What can I do in this case? I want to take an action against this.

    Looking foward for a prompt response and your kind support.

    Best Regards

    Shubha Mittal

  57. Posted May 17, 2006 at 9:25 am | Permalink

    Shubha, your work is automatically copyrighted, at least in the United States as well as in most countries, the moment it is “published” or “fixed” in permanent form. Just add a copyright statement to your site, and follow the instructions in this article.

    Nothing is any different.

    Start with an email requesting removal of the copyright violating material, and that you are the copyright owner. Then send a second if no action is taken within 3-7 days. Up the threats. If more action is needed, send a warning that you will be notifying their hosts, advertisers, and search engines, in accordance with the DMCA, requesting their site be shut down or punished for copyright violation. If that doesn’t work, then follow through with the paperwork, as explained in the article.

    But don’t go heavy handed first. Let them know you know. Tell them what to do. If they don’t, then move slowly towards other actions. All of this is “free” and just a bit time consuming. Lawyers don’t need to be called in or money spent until things get really ugly, which can take months. Usually things stop way before then.

    But DO SOMETHING. By letting one person get away with it, you give permission for them to repeat the offense with someone else, and you give permission for others to steal content and plagiarize. And you help perpetuate the myth that there is nothing anyone can do. STOP IT!

  58. Medv
    Posted June 12, 2006 at 5:27 pm | Permalink

    What did you do if after email with removal request you receive answer that content publisher has allready agreement with author and it’s not you (as he claims)?

  59. Posted June 12, 2006 at 10:57 pm | Permalink

    Find the proof and evidence to back your claim and send it to them with a cease and desist letter. But find the proof, as described in the article. Proof, substantiated by dates and times, is usually enough. From there, it is up to them to prove that the author is who they say it is.

  60. marie
    Posted June 13, 2006 at 5:54 pm | Permalink

    WHY DID YOU NOT PUT A COPYRIGHT ON THIS ARTICLE.Is this free content?I am looking for public domain content and images.I promise i won’t take yours

  61. Posted June 13, 2006 at 6:22 pm | Permalink

    Remember, ignorance is no excuse. I do not need to have a copyright on this article to be copyrighted. But there has always been a copyright on everything I publish in this blog, as there is on this article. Just because you don’t see it, doesn’t mean it isn’t there. It’s there. It’s at the bottom of the article and in the sidebar and in the About page.

    Assume EVERYTHING is copyright protected. Everything. Start with that belief and ask permission before taking anything. Then you don’t have to worry about being a thief.

  62. Posted June 21, 2006 at 1:35 pm | Permalink

    Yes I know what you mean: its a common enough view that someone has stolen your poetry or your way of writing up a view or an idea for the commericial market which results in positive selling of that poem: I discovered this quite recently: everything I had received personally was echoed out in a Trade Paper/yet I hadnt disclosed anything at all: however, they came to grief when they copied again: they got it wrong: its always best to check with the author - otherwise you can make an awful fool of yourself copying up what you think is my idea and you discover that second time around I was protected by contract!

  63. Posted July 14, 2006 at 2:20 pm | Permalink

    Howdy. I was trying to refer someone else to this post, so I searched for “copyright” in the upper right box. I kept getting the page re-loaded.

    Then I finally firgured out, “Copyright Lorelle VanFossen with the tip also including “copyright” is at the base of each post.

    I switched my search to “Creative Commons”, but maybe the selection of keywords, searchwords, etc needs to keep this in mind?

  64. Posted July 14, 2006 at 6:13 pm | Permalink

    This particular WordPress Theme shows entire posts in its search results, not excepts, something I find frustrating and unable to change as I do not have control of Theme details with WordPress.com. That’s why you saw the page reloaded. And yes, that is my copyright link. So good keywords would be “content theft”, “steal”, “stealing”, and “copyright theft” and combinations thereof.

  65. Posted July 18, 2006 at 8:00 pm | Permalink

    This happen to me recently. My content showed up on an xxx site.

  66. Posted July 22, 2006 at 1:09 pm | Permalink

    if they continue to do it and you are an advanced wordpress user try this (it normally makes them shut down their blog in an instant).

    [EDITED OUT]

    I did this to one of my posts because I was having an offender on my blog.

  67. Posted July 22, 2006 at 2:09 pm | Permalink

    I will repeat again, very loudly this time. Revenge actions are inappropriate and not acceptable. I do not encourage, recommend, nor accept revenge is a viable response. It will only hurt you and your reputation, and could possibly result in legal action being taken against you for defacement or vandalism.

  68. Posted July 25, 2006 at 4:50 pm | Permalink

    I have been wondering how to deal with it. Thanks the article provide really good info. The internet is growing and there are going to be alot more cases,so having the right infomation to protect yourself is great. Great Info!!!

  69. Posted July 27, 2006 at 4:45 pm | Permalink

    very very helpful! thanks!

  70. Posted July 30, 2006 at 11:20 pm | Permalink

    I just discovered 3 days ago that some 130 of my webpages were “lifted” in April 2006 and are now readily accessible on the Internet complete with all my meta tags intact, but my name and site name have been deleted. Your article has been most helpful in finding out what to do. Thanks.

    Hope you don’t mind that I have added a link to your excellent article under Tools for Webmasters at http://geocities.com/researchguide/000-005.html#tools.

  71. nothappy
    Posted August 9, 2006 at 10:05 am | Permalink

    I have just discovered that a blog on wordpress.com has copied entire articles from my site, including images (though they did not hotlink to the images, they copied them). The site has copied articles in their entirety from other sites too. The site in question doesn’t have a contact email. Does anyone know if it is worth contacting wordpress.com to reprimand this offender?

  72. Posted August 13, 2006 at 6:37 am | Permalink

    Excellent post. Thanks for the directions on copyrighting and all the info.

  73. Posted August 14, 2006 at 11:53 am | Permalink

    Thanks for the great post (and thanks to Google for finding it for me). I’ve added a link to it to my Graphic Design lens on Squidoo, http://www.squidoo.com/DesignerToolbox/ and my blog, where I hope other designers will also read and benefit from it.