Skip navigation

Content Theft and WordPress NewsI and many WordPress “representatives”, along with the developers and staff of and , are getting more and more complaints and requests for help dealing with content theft issues. We all need to clear this up and spread the word about how this works in relationship to WordPress.

In order to go after a copyright violation of your content, you have to contact the site owner first. When that fails, you ask the web host for assistance, in accordance with the DMCA, to contact the site owner and deal with the copyright violation. Herein lies the problem.

As Mark Jaquith recently stated, there is a lot of name confusion between a blog and a blog. Since a web host in the United States is required to assist with copyright infringement issues when contacted, when is WordPress the host and when is it not? After all, it’s all WordPress, right?


A blog “Powered by WordPress” is not hosted by WordPress, Automattic, or any of its affiliates. WordPress, and its parent company, Automattic, has no responsibility for the site nor its content as they only provide the free program that runs the blog. Going after WordPress in this instance is like going after Microsoft for copyright violation of content printed from Word. WordPress, like Microsoft, is not responsible for the end use of their products.

A blog on , with the footer statement “Get a free blog on” or Blog at is hosted by the free blog hosting service owned and operated by , and the servers and business are based within the United States, therefore, the host comes under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) and must assist copyright holders in removing copyright violation content when requested – just required of search engines and other web hosts.

I know how frustrating the battle is against content thieves. The abuse of feed scrapers using our content on their ad-filled splogs is growing daily. Many believed only top bloggers were targets. Now, their “little” blogs are being scraped and their content used without their permission – leaving them feeling victimized and helpless as web hosts, especially blog hosting services, offer no simple and easy solution to reporting, or force the victim to jump through a lot of hoops in order to report.

The issue at hand, though, is blaming WordPress for the evil doing of content thieves. Here are some clues to figure out if you should contact regarding content theft:


Blog at slogan

  • If the blog’s URL is
  • If the blog’s footer says “Blog at” or the equivalent.
  • If the WHOIS report for the site lists and/or Automattic as the web host.

Do not contact WordPress or

Powered by WordPress slogan

  • If the blog’s URL does not include
  • If the WHOIS report does not list or Automattic as the web host.
  • If the footer says “Powered by WordPress”.

Here is the policy for handling content theft.

For users copying other bloggers, copyright holders are asked to provide links to the original and copied post. The violator is contacted and asked to either create an excerpt of the copyright violated content with appropriate credit links, or to remove the content. If they fail to comply, they get a warning notice on their blogs. If it continues, reserves the right to remove the copyright violating content or take more aggressive action for failure to comply. blog problem warning

For bloggers reporting copyright violations by bloggers, they are instructed to use the DMCA reporting process. Violators receive a warning with a seven-day deadline. If they fail to comply, their blogs will be shut down. Again, proof of copyright infringement must be proven in accordance with the DMCA. support recommends you leave a comment on the violator’s blog first, then contact them through the DMCA reporting process with the link to the original content, copy content, and link to your comment asking the violator to remove your copyright violating content.

Do not report “He is copying from my blog” or “She is linking to my pictures” in your compliant. Be very specific and to the point.

This post of is a copy of my blog at


The picture in the post at is linking to my pictures on my blog and specifically from this post:

They don’t need to hear the whole story and nothing but the story. They just need the facts. The faster they get the information, the faster they can respond.

Remember, if the blogger is using a Fair Use equivalent, and not your blog’s whole content, they may be within their rights to use your content. admits that while Fair Use is pretty hard to define, clear copying of a whole post meets the requirements of a copyright violation.

According to support, the record for compliance with a copyright violation notice is two minutes. However, this is not the norm. Terms of Service reports and copyright violations are handled throughout the work day as fast as possible. The time delays come from non-responsive bloggers, either with those who report the violation without enough information or waiting on the offending blogger’s response, totally out of the hands of

What You Need to Know About Reporting Copyright Violations

Sidebar Feeds: WordPress and blogs have the capability to add feeds to their sidebars through feed Widgets and Plugins. The content that arrives is usually limited to post titles and/or a few words in an excerpt. Accordingly, these are considered by to be within Copyright Fair Use and cannot be stopped. If you do not like the blog which is using your feed post titles or excerpts, you have to take it up directly with them.

Copyright Policy Doesn’t Match Copyright Violation Request: Many people don’t understand how copyright works and head to and get a badge and slap it on their site with a “that’s done” pride. Most of the Creative Commons licenses allow use of your content in one form or the other, from totally free-to-use to can’t use at all. If you are reporting a copyright violation and your Creative Commons badge and license has permissions for usage that are not in compliance with your request to stop the copyright violation, you are stuck. Consider updating and changing your Creative Commons license and copyright policy to be very clear about what you will and will not allow for usage of your blog’s content.

Understand Fair Use: The copyright law is vague concerning what amounts to Fair Use of content. Is it only a line or two in a quote, or several paragraphs? I have a policy of 10% or 400 word limit, but there is no clear definition of what constitutes an abuse of Fair Use except that the usage hurts the market value for the original author.

For some, any usage of the content for commercial purposes, Fair Use or not, is a violation of their copyright policy. What is the definition of commercial? it used to mean content used for the purpose of generating income. Does that also mean a blog with ads? support reports that it’s really difficult to enforce copyright policies when there are those who have no problem using other people’s content within Fair Use but scream when their content is used accordingly. Consistency and fairness in practice helps.

How to Report and Handle Copyright Violations: Jonathan Bailey’s article series featuring 5 Content Theft Myths and Why They Are False and The 6 Steps to Stop Content Theft are clear introductions to how to report and handle copyright violations. I go into more detail in “What Do You Do When Someone Steals Your Content“. There is also good information for WordPress and users on the Support Forums.

Copyright is about playing nice and fair. There is a lot of trust involved with a lot of loose laws to protect the copyright owner. Set an example for others on how you protect the rights of other blogger’s content, and do your best to make sure your content is also protected.

Related Articles

Site Search Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Feed on Lorelle on WordPress Subscribe Feedburner iconVia Feedburner Subscribe by Email
Copyright Lorelle VanFossen, the author of Blogging Tips, What Bloggers Won't Tell You About Blogging.


  1. Marcel Leonardi
    Posted February 4, 2008 at 5:25 am | Permalink

    Thank you for such informative post, Lorelle. One little mistake, though: it is not correct to say that Creative Commons licenses allow use of your content in one form or the other, from totally free-to-use to can’t use at all. All Creative Commons licenses allow the copying of the content, as long as attribution is given.

    Some licenses don’t allow derivative works, others don’t allow the use for commercial purposes, and others don’t allow both. However, even the most restrictive CC license allows people to copy the content that was licensed that way.

    In fact, the most restrictive license, the Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0, states that “You are free: to Share — to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work, under the following conditions: Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Noncommercial. You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work”.

  2. Darren Cronian
    Posted February 4, 2008 at 5:40 am | Permalink

    Thanks Lorelle, for the advice.

    What is the blog is a Blogspot, Google blog, would we contact Google direct? Does anyone know of a contact form or a form of communication to contact Google about copyright material. Most of the splogs I see are blogspot ones to be honest.

  3. Posted February 4, 2008 at 6:52 am | Permalink

    My blog does not have much information to be copied, but my blog’s images are sometimes hot linked without my permission. There was once I left a comment on a site asking them to remove the image they stolen. They were very smart, they cropped off my blog’s name from the photo and made it smaller. But I knew it was my property at first sight

  4. Posted February 4, 2008 at 7:24 am | Permalink

    For Darren: Google is the contact for Blogger blogs, and I’ve had very good luck getting copyrighted material pulled down using their process. Here’s the info:

  5. Posted February 4, 2008 at 7:56 am | Permalink

    “Theft” is not possible for intellectual content. Internet content is something which cannot be stolen. No one will ever be able to stop inter-use of Internet content. Believing that one can do that, is a failure to understand the Internet—it’s an adolescent belief.

  6. Posted February 4, 2008 at 8:28 am | Permalink

    vkeong – the best way to stop hot linking is to go through your web hosting provider and have that ability turned off. For one photography client I did that because of the same thing.

    weathervane – While there is a very fine line against internet content theft, it still is something that can be stolen. While the internet content is usually called ‘fair use’ it is also called perjury if used without consent or credit to the originator. Many web hosts have pretty strict policy against this.

  7. Posted February 4, 2008 at 8:46 am | Permalink

    I spend plenty of time writing posts but people
    copy paste them very quickly and sadly
    the copy pasted post will have more visits than mine.
    God damn all “copy pasters” !!

  8. Posted February 4, 2008 at 9:40 am | Permalink

    With contacting certain webhosts, they’ll just say, right to your face, “I don’t give a damn”, and not do shit about it. Dreamhost is one of those companies (most of the scrapping that I have done on my blog is from someones hosted by Dreamhost). The flat-out told me that they won’t do anything unless a lawyer contacts them o.O

  9. Posted February 4, 2008 at 10:17 am | Permalink

    The problem is that one has to take out time and energy to waste on some content thief.
    And then you think, “Is it worth it, I would rather work upon my new post”.

    BTW nice points you listed.
    Thanks for information 🙂

  10. Posted February 4, 2008 at 10:18 am | Permalink

    @ Sarah:

    Web hosts based within the United States must comply with the DMCA or they are breaking the law. Hit them with that.

  11. Posted February 4, 2008 at 11:52 am | Permalink

    A lot of the blogs that steal content with feed stuff are on blogspot.

  12. Posted February 4, 2008 at 12:16 pm | Permalink

    Great article about how to deal with Copyright infringements. It is a tough line to walk, of what is and isn’t ‘fair use’ but only by people protecting their intellectual property, can a dent be made in this.

    On the note about hotlinking, use your htaccess file to prevent hotlinking, and if you have cPanel there is a feature in it that will generate the necessary code for your htaccess.

    Great info again. Thanks.

  13. Posted February 4, 2008 at 1:00 pm | Permalink

    Good and concise. Thanks, Lorelle. This will come in handy, not just for me, but in the dot com support forum.

  14. Posted February 4, 2008 at 2:27 pm | Permalink

    Lorelle: Great article, I don’t have much to add as I think it covered everything pretty nicely.

    I do want to extend an open invitation though, if you’re having trouble with a site and want someone to help track down and tell you who to get in touch with, send me an email and I’ll gladly have a look at it.

    It will likely be Wednesday before I’m able to get back in touch with you, but I will do what I can to help!

  15. Posted February 4, 2008 at 2:49 pm | Permalink

    Great writeup.

  16. Posted February 4, 2008 at 3:57 pm | Permalink

    I really enjoyed reading your article…From my perspective, I see many blogs out there that seemed to be scraped materials from others. While I understand the concept MEME, I really disagree that using that content without back referencing that content to the original author is despicable.

  17. Posted February 4, 2008 at 4:28 pm | Permalink

    @ Jenny:

    Yes, many Google Blogger/Blogspot sites are scrapers and spammers, which is why Google needs to make it easier for tracking those sites down and stopping them, as well as copyright owners reporting on the violations. It has a terrible, and justified, reputation for “bad” blogs, which is so sad. It doesn’t have to be that way.

    Still, while we are passing out blame, don’t forget that the majority of scrapers are self-hosted, and the biggest bastards are trying to pass themselves off as “aggregators” – indiscriminate aggregators.

  18. Posted February 4, 2008 at 4:31 pm | Permalink

    @ Arun Pal Singh:

    You make a good point but, hmm, let’s see, I just spent two minutes this morning commenting on four blogs violating my content. An hour later, I’ve heard from two who apologized and removed the full content from their blogs, and I just checked and their third has removed the content, too. Checking took me less than a minute. Not bad for a days’ work. 😀

    It’s a myth that it takes a lot of time to stop a content thief. That’s why they keep getting away with it.

    It does take time, however, to write about content theft on your blog and help to teach others – the more we teach and educate everyone that being a copycat isn’t nice, the less we may have to spend any time battling this issue.

    I consider it time well spent.

  19. Posted February 5, 2008 at 5:27 am | Permalink

    Good advice all round, I’ve started following a wikipedia style of attribution… Images and such content are listed with a fair-use rationale and list the source as accurately as possible.

    It seems like good practice to ensure that the used content is limited (Be that a lower quality version of an image or a limited quote of a fuller article [so as to encourage a return to the original author/creator])and that you justify your use of the content with a link to your source.

    vkeong: You can scupper hot-linking by editing your .htaccess, some web searches should give you advice on possible solutions.

  20. Dan Butcher
    Posted February 5, 2008 at 7:57 am | Permalink

    @ Lorelle: I was wondering if you could elaborate a little what you see as the difference between a site that aggregates content (and helps authors by sending readers back to the original blog posts)and the scraper site. I’ve seen some sites that made me wonder, “Is this legit, or is this capitalizing off the work of others in a bad way?”

  21. Posted February 5, 2008 at 9:48 am | Permalink

    @ Dan Butcher:

    Good question, and one that can sometimes, though rarely, be in the eye of the beholder and copyright owner.

    If your copyright policy is clear that it does not allow for commercial use of your content nor full post content use, only Fair Use, then it could be that any blog or site using ads with your full post content is violating your copyright. That’s pretty clear, scraper or not.

    To answer your question more specifically, a “good” aggregator is typically one that specializes in specific information and one that does not use full post content but only Fair Use excerpts. It respects your copyrights, whether or not they ask. Techmeme is a good example.

    A “bad” – very bad – example is one that is ad keyword based and uses your content, by Fair Use or otherwise – as its sole source of content without discrimination. You’ve probably seen your posts show up as title links, excerpts, or full posts on sites for drugs, sex, and totally unrelated subjects.

    It’s kind of a “you know them when you see them” but it boils down to what your copyright allows and whether or not you have a clear enough case for copyright violation. If their usage is within your copyright policy, then there isn’t much you can do about it.

  22. Posted February 5, 2008 at 5:57 pm | Permalink

    thanks for the very useful information.

  23. John
    Posted February 5, 2008 at 7:44 pm | Permalink


  24. Posted February 6, 2008 at 1:06 am | Permalink

    I’ve been getting the problem of blogs taking the first paragraph or so of my post then simply linking it to me via trackback.

  25. Posted February 6, 2008 at 9:30 am | Permalink

    @ trench:

    The first paragraph of usage can be considered acceptable under copyright’s Fair Use. Not much you can do about it unless your copyright policy clearly states that you will not allow ANY usage for any reason. For me, since I do not allow commercial use of my content nor use as a substitute for original content, I can ask them to remove my blog from the free scraper. They may or may not comply, and I may or may not have enough clout to take them to court with that kind of policy, but copyright law is changing due to these blatant abuses, and one day, I might be able to nail their buns to the wall for such usage. (…she smiles and dreams. 😀 )

  26. Posted February 6, 2008 at 10:06 pm | Permalink


  27. Posted February 6, 2008 at 10:14 pm | Permalink

    I really don’t care. What a waste of precious time and energy. I have felt no discernable impact from scrapers. Sometimes what they do is so funny, I even point it out. Welcome to the internet, people. Quit acting like it’s still a Gutenberg press world. You have better things to do.

  28. Posted February 6, 2008 at 11:01 pm | Permalink

    Thanks! Very useful!

  29. Posted February 29, 2008 at 10:41 am | Permalink

    Excellent information! This will really help me out.

  30. Posted April 17, 2008 at 12:40 pm | Permalink

    Most guys out there now go for plagiarism rather than theft, and belief me when I say it is easier to get away with it than it is with theft.

  31. Steve
    Posted July 16, 2008 at 3:09 pm | Permalink

    Your right about the host issue. As a Trademark Lawyer I deal with this quite a bit. Thanks for the article.

  32. Posted July 24, 2008 at 12:49 pm | Permalink

    Might also be interested in reading this resourceful post on Content Theft and WordPress.

  33. Posted August 7, 2008 at 7:50 pm | Permalink

    hello this is diesel28 from gaararug on has been copying from my site continualy i have wanrd him twice first it was only my pictures but now he copys my whole posts somtimes this is what he does he copys the post and just past it with no credit to my sit:(

  34. Posted August 7, 2008 at 9:12 pm | Permalink

    @ blackd boy47:

    I assume that you have reported this to the WordPress support team. Is it their job to respond to such allegations to protect your content, especially within They are strong advocates of copyright protection.

    It is also your responsibility to teach your readers and yourself about how copyright works, especially about Fair Use to everyone can learn and blog in peace.

    Thanks and good luck.

  35. Posted August 19, 2008 at 11:55 am | Permalink

    Excellent information! This will really help me out.

  36. Posted September 3, 2008 at 3:35 pm | Permalink

    The more time that is spent dissecting, analyzing, and critiquing a design by the wrong kinds of people the worse that design gets. The same trend applies to the number of people involved in the design process.
    Thx a lot for infomation!

  37. MrPete
    Posted November 22, 2008 at 8:38 am | Permalink

    Hi Lorelle,
    I’m new to blogging, new to WordPress, (new to you :))…
    I published a new plugin that’s quickly gaining popularity.
    I’m trying to understand how to think about articles referring to my plugin.

    Here is a good example.

    Should I be pleased that they wrote a couple of original sentences?
    Should I be upset that 90% of the “article” is simply copied from my readme file?
    Should I give up before I even begin, accepting that I need to choose my battles wisely?

    And, just to make things more interesting: I got a pingback from a posting… in Persian! Not even Google Translate knows how to decipher it. What do you do when you have absolutely no clue what “they” are saying about your blog posting? Do you accept such pingbacks or block ’em?!!

    What an amazing world we live in…

  38. Posted November 22, 2008 at 11:40 am | Permalink

    @ MrPete:

    First, the second post is in Arabic not Persian – which is Arabic. Well, a derivative. It’s hard to read as much of it is translated phonetically rather than precisely, but you get the idea that they are excited about the Plugin. BloggingPro is not a plagiarist, either.

    When you publish a WordPress Plugin under the GPL license, the description of the Plugin must be copied, at least in part, to help describe the Plugin to the readers. If you wrote your Plugin description well, the clarity of your words to describe it is the best choice to help promote it. It’s like quoting a press release. You want your Plugin promoted, don’t you? If not, then why put the information into the WordPress Directory?

    Think this through and be honored anyone paid any attention to your Plugin.

    This is vastly different from plagiarism or content theft. Your announcement in the WordPress Directory DEMANDS it be republished, and its covered by GPL anyway.

  39. Bill Sardi
    Posted January 13, 2009 at 10:58 pm | Permalink

    Before ANY blogger can participate at WORDPRESS, they should be required to read about content theft and sign they have read it. That WORDPRESS is not liable is silly. The whole idea of blogging is to encourage content theft. The majority of bloggers have nothing original to say. Most can’t even write. WORDPRESS is laying the trap, but saying someone else put their foot in it. The day will come when someone with money will challenge the blog hosts and their whole scheme of theft will unravel.

    • Posted January 13, 2009 at 11:17 pm | Permalink

      I’m confused with your comment. WordPress is not responsible for content theft. Those who use WordPress products are liable for whatever they do with their blogs, not WordPress. has a very strict policy on content theft, as should every blogger and website creator and owner in the world, letting others know how they want their content used instead of others doing what they will without permission. When someone signs up for a account, the terms of service state clearly that copyright violators will be warned and then their sites shut down if they fail to comply.

      But WordPress does not encourage content theft. People who didn’t learn in school that it is against the rules to copy others are the ones at fault. Copyright is the law. free hosted blogs have a staff that works hard to protect the rights of copyright owners, as the law requires. I’m proud that they are.

      As for bloggers who blog without original content, I would like to see these sites shut down. There is aggregation and republishing of content WITH PERMISSION and then copyright violation. The latter must end on the web.

26 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. […] still a slow news day, but that doesn’t lessen the fact that Lorelle’s got a great post up on content theft and WordPress […]

  2. […] Van Fossen has written an informative article with some potentially effective suggestions for fighting online content infringements. A good […]

  3. […] на блоге Lorelle статья Content Theft and WordPress. Смысл всё тот же, что делать если спёрли посты. А так […]

  4. […] Lorelle discusses content theft on Splogs continue to grow at a rapid rate.     Enjoy the article? Please take a second to: Digg it! | StumbleUpon it! Post a Comment […]

  5. […] of those stories that caught me eye was by Lorelle VanFossen, who had a post that I immediately bookmarked to read later in depth this evening. This lady has great strategy […]

  6. […] also a good article by Lorelle about Content Theft and WordPress on her blog if you’re a WordPress […]

  7. […] was just browsing the random RSS aggregated links on my WordPress dashboard as an admin, and it linked to a few blog posts about how to protect your […]

  8. […] has another great article on Content Theft and WordPress. Content theft is becoming a bigger issue (i’ve got at least a dozen automatic blogs […]

  9. […] be a little different depending on which one you own. Learn more about wordpress content theft at Lorelle’s blog. Site Tags:blog scraping, content theft, copyright infringement, wordpress addthis_url = […]

  10. […] Content Theft And How Report It- Lorelle Van Fossen has written a detailed article that explains how you can report content theft on your or blog. This article contains a slew of great information and I’ll be looking forward to seeing what Jonathan Bailey has to add in his speech about this subject at WordCamp Dallas. […]

  11. […] Content Theft and WordPress […]

  12. […] touches on the problems of blog scraping in her post Blogs Feeds Scraped and Content Theft and WordPress is a brand new post worth checking out. First, you noticed that I didn’t say “if” […]

  13. […] informatie over content theft vindt u bij Lorelle. Waar ik hoorde over de plugin die ik nu gebruik om mijn feeds van die regel te voorzien weet ik zo […]

  14. […] someone has stolen a complete – copyrighted – entry I use the DMCA reporting system, as outlined by Lorelle on her site recently, and have the item removed by the webhosting service […]

  15. […] Content Theft and WordPress […]

  16. […] blogger directly, and/or another blogger. For instance, if a bloggers is found to be violating copyrights by plagiarizing content or violating the Terms of Service with advertising, they are often warned several […]

  17. […] Content Theft And How Report It- Lorelle Van Fossen has written a detailed article that explains how you can report content theft on your or blog. This article contains a slew of great information and I’ll be looking forward to seeing what Jonathan Bailey has to add in his speech about this subject at WordCamp Dallas. […]

  18. […] might also be interested in reading this resourceful post on Content Theft and WordPress. [Thanks to timethief for […]

  19. […] touches on the problems of blog scraping in her post Blogs Feeds Scraped and Content Theft and WordPress is a brand new post worth checking out. First, you noticed that I didn’t say “if” […]

  20. […] Content Theft and WordPress […]

  21. […] to install.  My research has led me to several articles complaining about splogs (spam blogs) and content theft, but none really gave any solutions to combat the […]

  22. […] blog administrator, owner, and contributors, not the software or blogging platform. For example, report self-hosted WordPress blogs to the proper authorities, not WordPress, as they are not responsible for the content. However, is responsible for blogs […]

  23. […] have already mentioned Google and here is a great post by ”Lorelle On WordPress” –  that you can use ONLY if the blog is hosted on (not self hosted and […]

  24. […] have already mentioned Google and here is a great post by ”Lorelle On WordPress” –  that you can use ONLY if the blog is hosted on (not self hosted and […]

  25. […] Content Theft and WordPress […]

  26. […] Content Theft and WordPress […]

Post a Comment

Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: