Skip navigation

Searching for Blogs and Blogging Resources on DMOZ-Google Open Directory

While I wasn’t looking, it appears DMOZ, the “largest human-edited directory on the web” is now in the hands of Google. Still, it’s a fascinating place to explore and search for all kinds of information and resources in a directory catalog form rather than just searching. Like a phone book, your search begins by categorized subjects and works its way down.

As I did some digging for information on blogs, weblogs, blogging tools, and blog related subjects, I found some surprises and some interesting categories.

One of the surprises is a new feature that sorts the directory results by Google Page Rank. You do have an option to view them in alphabetical order, but the page rank order is the default.

Blogging information is stored under Computers > Internet > On the Web > Weblogs, which makes sense once you think about it, though I would have put Weblogs under Internet and skipped the whole “On the Web” thing, if I were in charge.

Under that category you find many different sub-categories and related categories for Weblogs such as Articles, Chats and Forums, Collaborative, Comment Spam, Hosts, Using Weblogs in Education, Web Rings, and Web Design and Development.

The bloggers are grouped in a variety of ways. Under the Weblogs category, I found Personal bloggers totaling 3,118 on the list the day I checked. Wow! Next largest group of categorized bloggers is Cooking blogs at 196. That’s a huge drop in numbers. Other blogger categories includes News, Photoblogs, Science, Religion and Spirituality, and Technology.

Related Weblog categories actually expand the various blogger categories, positioning bloggers by subject and category under Arts and other main categories. Blogs are added manually so the submitters designate the category into which they go. If approved, they show up in that category. This means that not all blogs listed show up under Weblogs, but under various categories such as Arts, Online Writing, Travel, and other categories. I found blogs under E-zines, Online Writing > Journals, Family Websites, Travelogues, and a resounding 11,282 sites under Society > People > Personal Homepages. Ah! Your personal “homepage” comes under the society pages. La-dee-dah!

Under the Weblogs > Tools category, I finally found where WordPress and other blogging programs are stored under the Weblog Tools > Publishers category with WordPress, Movable Type, and among many other blogging programs new and old. I’ve long been perplexed by the term “blogging tool”. It sounds awful. I think of tools as something I find in my father’s garage stuffed in a toolbox and covered with rust. Not very romantic but useful. Weblog Publisher is such a wonderful name. Why didn’t they go with that? 😉

Among the other Weblog Tool categories I also found some resources for blogrolls, blog add-ons and whizzbangs, and categories such as Clients, Commenting, Syndication, Tracking, and Utilities.

Related categories to Weblog Tools are Arts > Online Writing > Journals > Resources, Content Management, and I found News Readers stored under Reference > Libraries > Library and Information Science > Technical Services > Cataloguing > Metadata > RDF > Applications > RSS > News Readers. Odd place for that. I would have thought News Readers would be under Weblog Tools or News not Libraries. More interesting stuff.

I went backwards to check out what was in the On the Web category and there I found a wide variety of web related topics including a favorite subject of mine, Worst of the Web. Here you find folks who have been writing about and collecting the worst the web has to offer, including their award winning worst websites in the world. Some of the fun sites included are Vincent Flanders’ Web Pages That Suck,, Worst of the Web, and Ambit’s Totally Useless. There are also 338 sites listed in the Useless Pages category.

If you are more of an optimist, there is also a category of Best of the Web.

While I use normal search engines all the time, there are times when cruising through web directories actually gives me the information I need when I’m having trouble coming up with the key words to use in my search. Instead of wasting time guessing at possible words to get my search results, I can drill down through categories and related categories to find what I want.

If you would like your blog or website added to the DMOZ Open Directory, you need to add it manually through their Submit a Site link. Some say it takes a long time for your submission to be approved, others say it happens quickly. My sites have always been added fairly quickly over the years. The key to submitting your site is to do so from the specific category in which you want your website or blog to appear. The “editor” of that category will handle the approval. Obviously, the more popular the category, the longer it might take to be reviewed and accepted.

To learn more about how it all works, see Open Directory Project about page, and if you would like to become a volunteer editor managing your own category and helping to build this fantastic directory resource, see how to Become an Editor.

And take a few minutes out and cruise through the various categories to see what treasures you may uncover.

Related Articles

Site Search Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Copyright Lorelle VanFossen, member of the 9Rules Network

Member of the 9Rules Blogging Network


  1. pip
    Posted November 1, 2006 at 5:01 am | Permalink


    Your article is factually incorrect. You write that “While I wasn’t looking, it appears DMOZ, the “largest human-edited directory on the web” is now in the hands of Google.” but this is wrong. DMOZ is owned by Netscape, which is owned by AOL which is owned by Time Warner. Google owns a 5% market share in AOL. Also, Google uses DMOZ data to populate it’s directory and has done so for many years.

    I would advise correcting your first paragraph, since the rest of it is good.

  2. Posted November 1, 2006 at 10:03 am | Permalink

    Do you have a link to an article or two validating that? My research shows that Google has “taken over” DMOZ, and I haven’t found anything to dispute that yet. The links I showcase in the article are all from the Google version of DMOZ, though I do include the “root” DMOZ address.

  3. pip
    Posted November 1, 2006 at 8:31 pm | Permalink

    Visit DMOZ at and read the documentation. Google is just a downstream user of the data, one of many listed in

    You should also read the Wikipedia article which gives more information along with

    Google has certainly not “taken over” DMOZ. They have just taken a copy of the directory RDF (which anyone can do, see and give it their own twist (for example, including the PR data).

  4. Posted November 3, 2006 at 7:22 am | Permalink

    I wish it were true that Google had taken over/bought DMOZ. That’s just the shot in the arm that it needs.

  5. Posted November 19, 2006 at 7:08 pm | Permalink

    I agree to pip.
    This is using the exact copy of data from DMOZ.But listed using different algorithms.

  6. Posted November 22, 2006 at 8:38 am | Permalink

    Google is indeed just a downstream “user” of the RDF data dump. Anyone is welcome to do the same on their own site, using the entire directory or just a part, as long as they use proper attribution.

Post a Comment

Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: