<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Showing Dates Not Just Times in Your Multi-Post Views</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/25/showing-dates-not-just-times-in-your-multi-post-views/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/25/showing-dates-not-just-times-in-your-multi-post-views/</link>
	<description>Helping you learn more and do more with WordPress</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:24:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Displaying the Date in Your WordPress Theme &#171; Lorelle on WordPress</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/25/showing-dates-not-just-times-in-your-multi-post-views/#comment-566186</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Displaying the Date in Your WordPress Theme &#171; Lorelle on WordPress]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 23:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/25/showing-dates-not-just-times-in-your-multi-post-views/#comment-566186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Showing Dates Not Just Times in Your Multi-Post Views [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Showing Dates Not Just Times in Your Multi-Post Views [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hheide</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/25/showing-dates-not-just-times-in-your-multi-post-views/#comment-382711</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hheide]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 08:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/25/showing-dates-not-just-times-in-your-multi-post-views/#comment-382711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I started my blog I had the date in my posts. But after Problogger had an article about dates I thought about it for a while.
My blog is about my growth as an artist. It doesn&#039;t matter so much that I used some technique three months ago as that learning a technique changes the way I draw my pictures.
I think the order of posting is a lot more important than the date of the posts. So I removed the dates.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I started my blog I had the date in my posts. But after Problogger had an article about dates I thought about it for a while.<br />
My blog is about my growth as an artist. It doesn&#8217;t matter so much that I used some technique three months ago as that learning a technique changes the way I draw my pictures.<br />
I think the order of posting is a lot more important than the date of the posts. So I removed the dates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lincoln</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/25/showing-dates-not-just-times-in-your-multi-post-views/#comment-382352</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lincoln]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 05:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/25/showing-dates-not-just-times-in-your-multi-post-views/#comment-382352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m using the time stamps on my site as well, down to the seconds.  Do you think that&#039;s a little excessive though?  :-)

Seriously, my permalinks contain the date, category, as well as the post title.  I think this results in the best combination permalink, and Google certainly seems happy with it.  Ironically enough I was forced to keep my permalink structure set up like this, otherwise several of my plugins crucial for my blog would break.

I&#039;ve been debating whether to remove time stamps altogether, but the reality is some of my content can still be considered time based, and without leaving a date it could likely mislead the reader.  I&#039;m not sure leaving it in just my permalink would be enough.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using the time stamps on my site as well, down to the seconds.  Do you think that&#8217;s a little excessive though?  <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Seriously, my permalinks contain the date, category, as well as the post title.  I think this results in the best combination permalink, and Google certainly seems happy with it.  Ironically enough I was forced to keep my permalink structure set up like this, otherwise several of my plugins crucial for my blog would break.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been debating whether to remove time stamps altogether, but the reality is some of my content can still be considered time based, and without leaving a date it could likely mislead the reader.  I&#8217;m not sure leaving it in just my permalink would be enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/25/showing-dates-not-just-times-in-your-multi-post-views/#comment-380983</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/25/showing-dates-not-just-times-in-your-multi-post-views/#comment-380983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thankfully the dates on my posts don&#039;t really matter.  The closest is with my radio site, where I obviously can&#039;t have a song in a show from 2006 when that song wasn&#039;t even written until 2007.  I&#039;m hoping that the year and month permalink structure will take care of that.

As for my photoblog, I&#039;ve toyed with the idea of removing all mentions of a date alltogether.  Since all I have for each post is a photograph I&#039;m not sure that the date is something that the reader even needs to see.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thankfully the dates on my posts don&#8217;t really matter.  The closest is with my radio site, where I obviously can&#8217;t have a song in a show from 2006 when that song wasn&#8217;t even written until 2007.  I&#8217;m hoping that the year and month permalink structure will take care of that.</p>
<p>As for my photoblog, I&#8217;ve toyed with the idea of removing all mentions of a date alltogether.  Since all I have for each post is a photograph I&#8217;m not sure that the date is something that the reader even needs to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James D Kirk</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/25/showing-dates-not-just-times-in-your-multi-post-views/#comment-380593</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James D Kirk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/25/showing-dates-not-just-times-in-your-multi-post-views/#comment-380593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess I never really thought about this much either. Well, at least as it relates to display on the page. The themes we started working from as we modified, to get to our current themes, which are pretty much completely customized, all had the date and time code in the post meta footer areas.

My personal challenge regarding this concept, however comes with me being able to quickly scan a Search Engine Results Page (SERP) for time relevant results. Google doesn&#039;t show helpful information like when the page was indexed, or last updated, so unless the site&#039;s operators are allowing the permalink structure to show dates (like Lorelle&#039;s site here tells me that this post was created June 25th, 2007) I have to &quot;take the risk&quot; that a helpful post title will give me relevant answers.

For these reasons, other research and gut feelings, at BoldlyGoing.com and AreYou.BoldlyGoing.com we have decided to set up what we believe to be an effective permalinking structure that will give (people like me) visual clues as to date relevancy on the SERP&#039;s, and may (or may not, who really knows) better ranking on those same pages.

We&#039;ve gone to one directory level with the year/month/date. It actually would look more like this in the URL: bg.com/2007_06_25/post-title-goes-here/ There&#039;s some speculation that dashes are used by the algorithm to separate words, while underscores &quot;_&quot; simply extend a word (meaning that it is all &quot;one&quot; word, not split up words). There are also believers out there that the closer your post page is to the top of your directory tree, the better it ranks. 4 directories down is where the post on this page appears to the spiders. Not sure I believe this makes a difference, but if it does...

Finally, some SEO folks think that the date directory structure is not needed and may hurt results. Again, not sure I believe that, but if it does, we felt that going with the entire date structure in one directory, and underscored vs. dashed was the way to get the good visual information into the URL so we could be just that much more relevant for the folks that find our links in the search engines.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I never really thought about this much either. Well, at least as it relates to display on the page. The themes we started working from as we modified, to get to our current themes, which are pretty much completely customized, all had the date and time code in the post meta footer areas.</p>
<p>My personal challenge regarding this concept, however comes with me being able to quickly scan a Search Engine Results Page (SERP) for time relevant results. Google doesn&#8217;t show helpful information like when the page was indexed, or last updated, so unless the site&#8217;s operators are allowing the permalink structure to show dates (like Lorelle&#8217;s site here tells me that this post was created June 25th, 2007) I have to &#8220;take the risk&#8221; that a helpful post title will give me relevant answers.</p>
<p>For these reasons, other research and gut feelings, at BoldlyGoing.com and AreYou.BoldlyGoing.com we have decided to set up what we believe to be an effective permalinking structure that will give (people like me) visual clues as to date relevancy on the SERP&#8217;s, and may (or may not, who really knows) better ranking on those same pages.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve gone to one directory level with the year/month/date. It actually would look more like this in the URL: bg.com/2007_06_25/post-title-goes-here/ There&#8217;s some speculation that dashes are used by the algorithm to separate words, while underscores &#8220;_&#8221; simply extend a word (meaning that it is all &#8220;one&#8221; word, not split up words). There are also believers out there that the closer your post page is to the top of your directory tree, the better it ranks. 4 directories down is where the post on this page appears to the spiders. Not sure I believe this makes a difference, but if it does&#8230;</p>
<p>Finally, some SEO folks think that the date directory structure is not needed and may hurt results. Again, not sure I believe that, but if it does, we felt that going with the entire date structure in one directory, and underscored vs. dashed was the way to get the good visual information into the URL so we could be just that much more relevant for the folks that find our links in the search engines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Helmond</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/25/showing-dates-not-just-times-in-your-multi-post-views/#comment-380540</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne Helmond]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/25/showing-dates-not-just-times-in-your-multi-post-views/#comment-380540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I completely agree with you about showing a full date. I dislike having to figure out whether the post was written in 2006 or 2007. I really appreciate date and name based Permalinks.
Whenever I am reading blogs I immediately want to know when a post was written. That is why I prefer a post date near (below/next to) the post title on both the front page view AND the single post view.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with you about showing a full date. I dislike having to figure out whether the post was written in 2006 or 2007. I really appreciate date and name based Permalinks.<br />
Whenever I am reading blogs I immediately want to know when a post was written. That is why I prefer a post date near (below/next to) the post title on both the front page view AND the single post view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/25/showing-dates-not-just-times-in-your-multi-post-views/#comment-380152</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/25/showing-dates-not-just-times-in-your-multi-post-views/#comment-380152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A more interesting problem to me is with sitemap.xml files. If you&#039;ve looked at yours you&#039;ll notice that entries for actual files/folders have a &quot;lastmod&quot; entry (for example: 2006-11-19T07:56:05Z). WP generated entries (pretty much ANY page or post in your blog) do not have these entries. Other than writing a custom version of the google sitemap generator (which could be done) to pull the info out of the DB I don&#039;t see an easy way around this.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A more interesting problem to me is with sitemap.xml files. If you&#8217;ve looked at yours you&#8217;ll notice that entries for actual files/folders have a &#8220;lastmod&#8221; entry (for example: 2006-11-19T07:56:05Z). WP generated entries (pretty much ANY page or post in your blog) do not have these entries. Other than writing a custom version of the google sitemap generator (which could be done) to pull the info out of the DB I don&#8217;t see an easy way around this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BONGO MIRROR</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/25/showing-dates-not-just-times-in-your-multi-post-views/#comment-379976</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BONGO MIRROR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/25/showing-dates-not-just-times-in-your-multi-post-views/#comment-379976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are completely right. This is extremely useful and I didn&#039;t notice it until you pointed it out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are completely right. This is extremely useful and I didn&#8217;t notice it until you pointed it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
