<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do You Get to The Point or Ramble to the Point In Your Blog?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/23/do-you-get-to-the-point-or-ramble-to-the-point-in-your-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/23/do-you-get-to-the-point-or-ramble-to-the-point-in-your-blog/</link>
	<description>Helping you learn more and do more with WordPress</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blog Struggles: The Search for Blog Content &#171; Lorelle on WordPress</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/23/do-you-get-to-the-point-or-ramble-to-the-point-in-your-blog/#comment-647758</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Struggles: The Search for Blog Content &#171; Lorelle on WordPress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/23/do-you-get-to-the-point-or-ramble-to-the-point-in-your-blog/#comment-647758</guid>
		<description>[...] Do You Get to The Point or Ramble to the Point In Your Blog? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Do You Get to The Point or Ramble to the Point In Your Blog? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogging first steps &#171; Mindtracks</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/23/do-you-get-to-the-point-or-ramble-to-the-point-in-your-blog/#comment-532211</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogging first steps &#171; Mindtracks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/23/do-you-get-to-the-point-or-ramble-to-the-point-in-your-blog/#comment-532211</guid>
		<description>[...] A useful tip from Lorelle on Wordpress  Do You Get to The Point or Ramble to the Point In Your Blog? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A useful tip from Lorelle on WordPress  Do You Get to The Point or Ramble to the Point In Your Blog? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mindtracks &#187; Blogging first steps</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/23/do-you-get-to-the-point-or-ramble-to-the-point-in-your-blog/#comment-476691</link>
		<dc:creator>Mindtracks &#187; Blogging first steps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 20:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/23/do-you-get-to-the-point-or-ramble-to-the-point-in-your-blog/#comment-476691</guid>
		<description>[...] A useful tip from Lorelle on Wordpress  Do You Get to The Point or Ramble to the Point In Your Blog? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A useful tip from Lorelle on WordPress  Do You Get to The Point or Ramble to the Point In Your Blog? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/23/do-you-get-to-the-point-or-ramble-to-the-point-in-your-blog/#comment-447539</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/23/do-you-get-to-the-point-or-ramble-to-the-point-in-your-blog/#comment-447539</guid>
		<description>You probably wouldn't know it with all my typos (I'm not a very strong typist) but I have a Master's in English and have taught a couple composition courses at a community college in my life.  One thing I would say is that this is the most unattractive feature in blogs I visit.  If it goes on without a question to me or a thesis (point!) past 4 or 5 sentences, I usually don't care to solve the mystery if you know what I mean.  Fortunately, this is a good way to weed out the blogroll entries you find and don't know if you should keep or not.  That's usually how I do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You probably wouldn&#8217;t know it with all my typos (I&#8217;m not a very strong typist) but I have a Master&#8217;s in English and have taught a couple composition courses at a community college in my life.  One thing I would say is that this is the most unattractive feature in blogs I visit.  If it goes on without a question to me or a thesis (point!) past 4 or 5 sentences, I usually don&#8217;t care to solve the mystery if you know what I mean.  Fortunately, this is a good way to weed out the blogroll entries you find and don&#8217;t know if you should keep or not.  That&#8217;s usually how I do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellen</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/23/do-you-get-to-the-point-or-ramble-to-the-point-in-your-blog/#comment-376011</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 12:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/23/do-you-get-to-the-point-or-ramble-to-the-point-in-your-blog/#comment-376011</guid>
		<description>I tend to be verbose so I like your point about putting the technical information first then if I want to share with my readers how I got there to do so afterwards.  Maybe put the tech info in a box to highlight it. I tend to write in long sentences too...I need to learn to shorten them down a bit.

Thanks for the tip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to be verbose so I like your point about putting the technical information first then if I want to share with my readers how I got there to do so afterwards.  Maybe put the tech info in a box to highlight it. I tend to write in long sentences too&#8230;I need to learn to shorten them down a bit.</p>
<p>Thanks for the tip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mpb</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/23/do-you-get-to-the-point-or-ramble-to-the-point-in-your-blog/#comment-374795</link>
		<dc:creator>mpb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 03:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/23/do-you-get-to-the-point-or-ramble-to-the-point-in-your-blog/#comment-374795</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Bloggers need to learn how to edit before they hit publish, as finding others to critique and editor your work before you hit publish is rare.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

My goodily gracious, Edgar, "preview"/"view" in a separate window is such a helpful @#$%^(*&#38;^% for that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Bloggers need to learn how to edit before they hit publish, as finding others to critique and editor your work before you hit publish is rare.</p></blockquote>
<p>My goodily gracious, Edgar, &#8220;preview&#8221;/&#8221;view&#8221; in a separate window is such a helpful @#$%^(*&amp;^% for that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorelle VanFossen</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/23/do-you-get-to-the-point-or-ramble-to-the-point-in-your-blog/#comment-374279</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorelle VanFossen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 23:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/23/do-you-get-to-the-point-or-ramble-to-the-point-in-your-blog/#comment-374279</guid>
		<description>The whole point of the article is directed towards technical articles, not personal. You can ramble all you want, though you might increase readership if you didn't, on a personal life story blog. But if you write a technical blog or blog post, get to the point.

Josh: There is no right or wrong way to blog. Gees, blogging is still in its infancy and while a style of blog writing has developed, it is a long way from becoming set in stone. 

There are, however, some basic guidelines for technical articles and technical writing that turns your blog post from rambling to educational. You want to help people learn, not fill them in on how late you were to work and how you didn't stop to take a shower or pee because you wanted to whip out this helpful post...we want the information directly related to the content, not your bathroom habits.

J.T.: Editing is another issue. The moment we hit "Publish" on our blogs, we become publishers, responsible for our blog content. Bloggers need to learn how to edit before they hit publish, as finding others to critique and editor your work before you hit publish is rare. 

Some bloggers don't want editors. But all bloggers should take a moment to proof and review and edit before hitting the button. After all, it's their resume and reputation they are publishing. :D

One of the reasons many bloggers start blogging, especially those who want to blog in English or another non-native language, is to improve their writing and communication skills. I'll be writing more on the issue of blog writing, from every angle, over the next few months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole point of the article is directed towards technical articles, not personal. You can ramble all you want, though you might increase readership if you didn&#8217;t, on a personal life story blog. But if you write a technical blog or blog post, get to the point.</p>
<p>Josh: There is no right or wrong way to blog. Gees, blogging is still in its infancy and while a style of blog writing has developed, it is a long way from becoming set in stone. </p>
<p>There are, however, some basic guidelines for technical articles and technical writing that turns your blog post from rambling to educational. You want to help people learn, not fill them in on how late you were to work and how you didn&#8217;t stop to take a shower or pee because you wanted to whip out this helpful post&#8230;we want the information directly related to the content, not your bathroom habits.</p>
<p>J.T.: Editing is another issue. The moment we hit &#8220;Publish&#8221; on our blogs, we become publishers, responsible for our blog content. Bloggers need to learn how to edit before they hit publish, as finding others to critique and editor your work before you hit publish is rare. </p>
<p>Some bloggers don&#8217;t want editors. But all bloggers should take a moment to proof and review and edit before hitting the button. After all, it&#8217;s their resume and reputation they are publishing. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>One of the reasons many bloggers start blogging, especially those who want to blog in English or another non-native language, is to improve their writing and communication skills. I&#8217;ll be writing more on the issue of blog writing, from every angle, over the next few months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby McGee</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/23/do-you-get-to-the-point-or-ramble-to-the-point-in-your-blog/#comment-374181</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby McGee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 23:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/23/do-you-get-to-the-point-or-ramble-to-the-point-in-your-blog/#comment-374181</guid>
		<description>This is marvellous. I am quite verbose, but with technical matters I try to be as blunt and succinct as I can. It *is* really important to be short and sweet, yet powerful and well-supported in writing, especially on the SAT. I actually do make a point to revise posts -- regardless of how old they are. By revision, I mean changing the sentence structure (e.g., a complex to a compound-complex), diction (e.g., removing trite words or phrases), and "cutting the fat" -- removing sheer verbiage.

I think if more high school English teachers read your blog, they'd actually approve of it and might *gasp* actually encourage it. It's writing at its core; however, it's not formal, so the standards are relaxed. Still, it *is* important to treat it as writing and an art that is *never* finished -- because no writing is ever wrong, it's just not finished. *smile*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is marvellous. I am quite verbose, but with technical matters I try to be as blunt and succinct as I can. It *is* really important to be short and sweet, yet powerful and well-supported in writing, especially on the SAT. I actually do make a point to revise posts &#8212; regardless of how old they are. By revision, I mean changing the sentence structure (e.g., a complex to a compound-complex), diction (e.g., removing trite words or phrases), and &#8220;cutting the fat&#8221; &#8212; removing sheer verbiage.</p>
<p>I think if more high school English teachers read your blog, they&#8217;d actually approve of it and might *gasp* actually encourage it. It&#8217;s writing at its core; however, it&#8217;s not formal, so the standards are relaxed. Still, it *is* important to treat it as writing and an art that is *never* finished &#8212; because no writing is ever wrong, it&#8217;s just not finished. *smile*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.T Dabbagian</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/23/do-you-get-to-the-point-or-ramble-to-the-point-in-your-blog/#comment-373652</link>
		<dc:creator>J.T Dabbagian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 18:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/23/do-you-get-to-the-point-or-ramble-to-the-point-in-your-blog/#comment-373652</guid>
		<description>Here's my problem with that statement: You are your own worst editor. Either you're far too vicious on yourself and end up obliterating what could have been a great post, or you're too lenient and end up leaving major flaws like the technical article you presented. 

The best way is to get another blogger/editor/other person to loon and critique your work, as they won't have the biases about it that you will have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my problem with that statement: You are your own worst editor. Either you&#8217;re far too vicious on yourself and end up obliterating what could have been a great post, or you&#8217;re too lenient and end up leaving major flaws like the technical article you presented. </p>
<p>The best way is to get another blogger/editor/other person to loon and critique your work, as they won&#8217;t have the biases about it that you will have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BONGO MIRROR</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/23/do-you-get-to-the-point-or-ramble-to-the-point-in-your-blog/#comment-373424</link>
		<dc:creator>BONGO MIRROR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 17:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/06/23/do-you-get-to-the-point-or-ramble-to-the-point-in-your-blog/#comment-373424</guid>
		<description>You are completely correct for technical blogs.

For personal blogs, I think the rambles are the point of the blog. While that may cost you readers, it seems to me those are readers that one doesn't want.

By the way, I think that this post could have been organized more as you describe organizing posts. You could have started with the bulleted points, been more succinct with the explanation and skipped the charming example altogether. If you wrote that way, I probably wouldn't be reading your stuff and I certainly wouldn't be leaving a comment here to say anything to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are completely correct for technical blogs.</p>
<p>For personal blogs, I think the rambles are the point of the blog. While that may cost you readers, it seems to me those are readers that one doesn&#8217;t want.</p>
<p>By the way, I think that this post could have been organized more as you describe organizing posts. You could have started with the bulleted points, been more succinct with the explanation and skipped the charming example altogether. If you wrote that way, I probably wouldn&#8217;t be reading your stuff and I certainly wouldn&#8217;t be leaving a comment here to say anything to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
