<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress 2.0.6 Released With Feedburner Fixes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/01/07/wordpress-206-released-with-feedburner-fixes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/01/07/wordpress-206-released-with-feedburner-fixes/</link>
	<description>Helping you learn more and do more with WordPress</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 02:12:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wordpress 2.0.6 Break FeedBurner at Ah Knight&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/01/07/wordpress-206-released-with-feedburner-fixes/#comment-142187</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wordpress 2.0.6 Break FeedBurner at Ah Knight&#8217;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/01/07/wordpress-206-released-with-feedburner-fixes/#comment-142187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] WordPress 2.0.6 Released With Feedburner Fixes [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WordPress 2.0.6 Released With Feedburner Fixes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blips</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/01/07/wordpress-206-released-with-feedburner-fixes/#comment-140963</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blips]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/01/07/wordpress-206-released-with-feedburner-fixes/#comment-140963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think all the plugins I use needs to be on there to be tested :)

I&#039;m joking but actually like Lorelle said after a new version is there I wait a while until people discovered things that break or not and been fixed before i use it. This time I took the plunge and it worked out well. I&#039;m on 2.06.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think all the plugins I use needs to be on there to be tested <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;m joking but actually like Lorelle said after a new version is there I wait a while until people discovered things that break or not and been fixed before i use it. This time I took the plunge and it worked out well. I&#8217;m on 2.06.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Computer Guru</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/01/07/wordpress-206-released-with-feedburner-fixes/#comment-140961</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Computer Guru]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/01/07/wordpress-206-released-with-feedburner-fixes/#comment-140961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guys, that&#039;s not true!

1) It&#039;s not a FeedBurner plugin, or even a FeedBurner issue that gets stuck: it&#039;s WordPress and how it sends 304 headers: corrupted!
2) My post and emails to WP-Hackers focused on FB, because that&#039;s where it was most obvious. However, any and all web-based and local RSS/Atom readers experience the same problem, FB or no FB. It&#039;s just whether they kill the feed or only flag it that differs. FB kills it - hence the seriousness of the issue.
3) It doesn&#039;t just affect Apache w/ mod_php but also virtually all IIS hosts as well: basically anything that uses a isapi/nsapi/*sapi module to extended the webserver with PHP support.

Many thanks to Mark for the super quick fix, and he *is* right, we do need more people testing it - but that&#039;s going around the fact. This isn&#039;t a &quot;minority only&quot; issue (Apache w/ mod_php *and* IIS w/ PHP as ISAPI probably add up to over 50% of all hosts, excluding other *sapi implementations), and it&#039;s in the WP-Core. It&#039;s not a plugin incompatibility, rather it&#039;s a simple, old-fashioned bug. But a fix exists, I guess that&#039;s what matters.

Let&#039;s just not kid ourselves and pretend it&#039;s nothing, because we&#039;re above that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys, that&#8217;s not true!</p>
<p>1) It&#8217;s not a FeedBurner plugin, or even a FeedBurner issue that gets stuck: it&#8217;s WordPress and how it sends 304 headers: corrupted!<br />
2) My post and emails to WP-Hackers focused on FB, because that&#8217;s where it was most obvious. However, any and all web-based and local RSS/Atom readers experience the same problem, FB or no FB. It&#8217;s just whether they kill the feed or only flag it that differs. FB kills it &#8211; hence the seriousness of the issue.<br />
3) It doesn&#8217;t just affect Apache w/ mod_php but also virtually all IIS hosts as well: basically anything that uses a isapi/nsapi/*sapi module to extended the webserver with PHP support.</p>
<p>Many thanks to Mark for the super quick fix, and he *is* right, we do need more people testing it &#8211; but that&#8217;s going around the fact. This isn&#8217;t a &#8220;minority only&#8221; issue (Apache w/ mod_php *and* IIS w/ PHP as ISAPI probably add up to over 50% of all hosts, excluding other *sapi implementations), and it&#8217;s in the WP-Core. It&#8217;s not a plugin incompatibility, rather it&#8217;s a simple, old-fashioned bug. But a fix exists, I guess that&#8217;s what matters.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s just not kid ourselves and pretend it&#8217;s nothing, because we&#8217;re above that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Jaquith</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/01/07/wordpress-206-released-with-feedburner-fixes/#comment-140913</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Jaquith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 21:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/01/07/wordpress-206-released-with-feedburner-fixes/#comment-140913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, it affects more than FeedBurner, it&#039;s just that FeedBurner handles it less gracefully than other consumers, so people are more likely to notice that issue.  Other consumers handle it a bit more gracefully, so no symptom is exhibited.  And it&#039;s worth noting that it&#039;s not an issue on all servers.  Apache with mod_php is the only environment in which I&#039;ve witnessed the bug.  It definitely warrants a 2.0.7 release, but not right away.  There were a few tickets that didn&#039;t quite make it into 2.0.6, and my workaround works for those who are affected.  I&#039;ve provided a drop-in solution, a patch, and a description of the fix, so hopefully that&#039;ll cover it for now.

But the one lesson here is that we need more testers for release candidates!  The fact that this was discovered within hours of WP 2.0.6 being released (when the bug had been in 2 release candidates, available for download for several weeks) just tells me that our tester pool isn&#039;t big enough.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it affects more than FeedBurner, it&#8217;s just that FeedBurner handles it less gracefully than other consumers, so people are more likely to notice that issue.  Other consumers handle it a bit more gracefully, so no symptom is exhibited.  And it&#8217;s worth noting that it&#8217;s not an issue on all servers.  Apache with mod_php is the only environment in which I&#8217;ve witnessed the bug.  It definitely warrants a 2.0.7 release, but not right away.  There were a few tickets that didn&#8217;t quite make it into 2.0.6, and my workaround works for those who are affected.  I&#8217;ve provided a drop-in solution, a patch, and a description of the fix, so hopefully that&#8217;ll cover it for now.</p>
<p>But the one lesson here is that we need more testers for release candidates!  The fact that this was discovered within hours of WP 2.0.6 being released (when the bug had been in 2 release candidates, available for download for several weeks) just tells me that our tester pool isn&#8217;t big enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jens</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/01/07/wordpress-206-released-with-feedburner-fixes/#comment-140887</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 21:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/01/07/wordpress-206-released-with-feedburner-fixes/#comment-140887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, that&#039;s a point... but now I&#039;ve got a idea: What plugins should be on the &quot;most used&quot; list for WordPress? How about such an article here?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, that&#8217;s a point&#8230; but now I&#8217;ve got a idea: What plugins should be on the &#8220;most used&#8221; list for WordPress? How about such an article here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recommended Update: WordPress 2.0.6 at The Blog Herald</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/01/07/wordpress-206-released-with-feedburner-fixes/#comment-140822</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Recommended Update: WordPress 2.0.6 at The Blog Herald]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 20:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/01/07/wordpress-206-released-with-feedburner-fixes/#comment-140822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] how to fix them, now. With the almost&#8211;instant response to this last&#8211;minute problem, Lorelle was quick to point out how well the community of WordPress developers are addressing reported problems and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] how to fix them, now. With the almost&#8211;instant response to this last&#8211;minute problem, Lorelle was quick to point out how well the community of WordPress developers are addressing reported problems and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorelle VanFossen</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/01/07/wordpress-206-released-with-feedburner-fixes/#comment-140814</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lorelle VanFossen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 20:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/01/07/wordpress-206-released-with-feedburner-fixes/#comment-140814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are a lot of other WordPress Plugins that meet the &quot;most used&quot; list long before Feedburner. ;-) And if this is the only one, then something is really going well, don&#039;t you think?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a lot of other WordPress Plugins that meet the &#8220;most used&#8221; list long before Feedburner. <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  And if this is the only one, then something is really going well, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jens</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/01/07/wordpress-206-released-with-feedburner-fixes/#comment-140755</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 19:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2007/01/07/wordpress-206-released-with-feedburner-fixes/#comment-140755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm... very euphemistic point of view:

&lt;em&gt;WordPress 2.0.6 has been released and already there are fixes for the new version, &lt;strong&gt;showing how fast WordPress developers respond&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;

I can really understand that you cannot test all plugins with a new version of WordPress. But the FeedBurner-plugin is - so I think - one of the most used plugins, so it should be in a test environment for new releases.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; very euphemistic point of view:</p>
<p><em>WordPress 2.0.6 has been released and already there are fixes for the new version, <strong>showing how fast WordPress developers respond</strong>.</em></p>
<p>I can really understand that you cannot test all plugins with a new version of WordPress. But the FeedBurner-plugin is &#8211; so I think &#8211; one of the most used plugins, so it should be in a test environment for new releases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
