<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do You Need Windows Vista?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/12/19/do-you-need-windows-vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/12/19/do-you-need-windows-vista/</link>
	<description>Helping you learn more and do more with WordPress</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 19:00:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: michaelper22</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/12/19/do-you-need-windows-vista/#comment-149690</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michaelper22]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/12/19/do-you-need-windows-vista/#comment-149690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m willing but not ready. My computer doesn&#039;t have enough RAM for Vista (and could use more for XP Pro too), and I bet that at least three of my components won&#039;t work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m willing but not ready. My computer doesn&#8217;t have enough RAM for Vista (and could use more for XP Pro too), and I bet that at least three of my components won&#8217;t work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macbikegeek</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/12/19/do-you-need-windows-vista/#comment-119910</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[macbikegeek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 03:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/12/19/do-you-need-windows-vista/#comment-119910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a long time Mac user who uses Windows for work because it is the corporate standard and a Mac for everything else. If you really want a Mac, get one. Leopard (the next version of OS X for the Mac) will be out in first quarter 2007 and will be ready to use when it comes out. I&#039;ll be installing it as soon as I get my hands on it. Looking forward to the roll-out of Vista at work because of the improved interface but it still won&#039;t be a Mac.

Lee]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a long time Mac user who uses Windows for work because it is the corporate standard and a Mac for everything else. If you really want a Mac, get one. Leopard (the next version of OS X for the Mac) will be out in first quarter 2007 and will be ready to use when it comes out. I&#8217;ll be installing it as soon as I get my hands on it. Looking forward to the roll-out of Vista at work because of the improved interface but it still won&#8217;t be a Mac.</p>
<p>Lee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Do You Need Vista? on iface thoughts</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/12/19/do-you-need-windows-vista/#comment-115555</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Do You Need Vista? on iface thoughts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 07:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/12/19/do-you-need-windows-vista/#comment-115555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Lorelle asks whether you need Windows Vista. She points to a Wired article which claims Why You Don&#8217;t Need Vista Now. I will not use it because I have not found any reason to upgrade, apart from bullying by Microsoft. I think a lot of people might want Vista, I am not sure if they need it. In fact with Vista I will need to spend more to get a newer hardware, that too for better graphics, not functionality. For my family who are used to Windows, the home laptop will stay at XP, and probably might get upgraded to Ubuntu later! I will stick with Kubuntu on my laptop. If you need more convincing read 25 shortcomings of Vista (via E@zyVG). After all this if you still want to continue, reading Amit Agarwal&#8217;s different avenues to grab a free Vista copy might bring relief to your budget. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lorelle asks whether you need Windows Vista. She points to a Wired article which claims Why You Don&#8217;t Need Vista Now. I will not use it because I have not found any reason to upgrade, apart from bullying by Microsoft. I think a lot of people might want Vista, I am not sure if they need it. In fact with Vista I will need to spend more to get a newer hardware, that too for better graphics, not functionality. For my family who are used to Windows, the home laptop will stay at XP, and probably might get upgraded to Ubuntu later! I will stick with Kubuntu on my laptop. If you need more convincing read 25 shortcomings of Vista (via E@zyVG). After all this if you still want to continue, reading Amit Agarwal&#8217;s different avenues to grab a free Vista copy might bring relief to your budget. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim W.</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/12/19/do-you-need-windows-vista/#comment-112428</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim W.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 05:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/12/19/do-you-need-windows-vista/#comment-112428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found the &lt;em&gt;Wired&lt;/em&gt; article a tad shrill, but I agree with much of it in substance. In fact, I&#039;m getting ready to roll back my installation of Vista Business on my home computer to Windows XP Professional SP 2 (that is to say, wipe the partition and reload the OS).

I&#039;m one of the unlucky ones with incompatible device drivers (Sound Blaster Audigy 2, among others). Furthermore, while I guess I enjoy many of the security improvements the Microsoft engineers made to the operating system, some of them are actually slowing me down a bit too much in my work (I haven&#039;t hit my learning curve with Vista yet, so I get frustrated working around some of them).

I agree with some of the other commenters. Better to wait and let Vista mature, and let third-party manufacturers &quot;catch up&quot; with device driver development for Vista.

Thanks,
Tim]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found the <em>Wired</em> article a tad shrill, but I agree with much of it in substance. In fact, I&#8217;m getting ready to roll back my installation of Vista Business on my home computer to Windows XP Professional SP 2 (that is to say, wipe the partition and reload the OS).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m one of the unlucky ones with incompatible device drivers (Sound Blaster Audigy 2, among others). Furthermore, while I guess I enjoy many of the security improvements the Microsoft engineers made to the operating system, some of them are actually slowing me down a bit too much in my work (I haven&#8217;t hit my learning curve with Vista yet, so I get frustrated working around some of them).</p>
<p>I agree with some of the other commenters. Better to wait and let Vista mature, and let third-party manufacturers &#8220;catch up&#8221; with device driver development for Vista.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: engtech</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/12/19/do-you-need-windows-vista/#comment-112178</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[engtech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 00:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/12/19/do-you-need-windows-vista/#comment-112178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll give my usual wait until after SP1 and most people are using it before I install.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll give my usual wait until after SP1 and most people are using it before I install.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franky</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/12/19/do-you-need-windows-vista/#comment-112070</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[franky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 22:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/12/19/do-you-need-windows-vista/#comment-112070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;that operating systems can’t come with allowances for older equipment, after all, the older they are the simpler the drivers should be, right&lt;/em&gt;
May I call BS?
Every &lt;strong&gt;basic&lt;/strong&gt; driver that comes without specific hardware details will be recognized as standard driver. It will work just as Apple OS X and many *NIX recognize hardware.
Many,. many and I really mean MANY drivers which have been correctly built upon the Windows SDK and been quality controlled (WHQL) will be standardly integrated among the Vista drivers (here again depending on what all comes with the hardware, obviously an all-in-one printer has own specifications and this would obviously bloat any OS, also would it mean that the hardware manufacturers open &lt;em&gt;their code&lt;/em&gt;... same here for modern graphics cards, but they work the standard drivers just aren&#039;t optimized)

&lt;em&gt;Security is one of the biggest bonuses Microsoft promotes with Vista, which is not a single fix. Even if they plug all the holes, there are evil doers out there with a microscope looking for more holes to tear open.&lt;/em&gt;
Lets wait till Apple reaches 12% market share and have a look at the influence of popularity and the OS&#039;s security then.

Windows Vista already is a very stable OS and will gain very soon popularity. But blame the OS manufacturer because the hardware manufacturer doesn&#039;t have a driver ready in a period of 4 months. BS.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>that operating systems can’t come with allowances for older equipment, after all, the older they are the simpler the drivers should be, right</em><br />
May I call BS?<br />
Every <strong>basic</strong> driver that comes without specific hardware details will be recognized as standard driver. It will work just as Apple OS X and many *NIX recognize hardware.<br />
Many,. many and I really mean MANY drivers which have been correctly built upon the Windows SDK and been quality controlled (WHQL) will be standardly integrated among the Vista drivers (here again depending on what all comes with the hardware, obviously an all-in-one printer has own specifications and this would obviously bloat any OS, also would it mean that the hardware manufacturers open <em>their code</em>&#8230; same here for modern graphics cards, but they work the standard drivers just aren&#8217;t optimized)</p>
<p><em>Security is one of the biggest bonuses Microsoft promotes with Vista, which is not a single fix. Even if they plug all the holes, there are evil doers out there with a microscope looking for more holes to tear open.</em><br />
Lets wait till Apple reaches 12% market share and have a look at the influence of popularity and the OS&#8217;s security then.</p>
<p>Windows Vista already is a very stable OS and will gain very soon popularity. But blame the OS manufacturer because the hardware manufacturer doesn&#8217;t have a driver ready in a period of 4 months. BS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heliologue</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/12/19/do-you-need-windows-vista/#comment-111462</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heliologue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/12/19/do-you-need-windows-vista/#comment-111462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s face it:  X.0 releases are never all that great.  XP (ok, so XP was technically an X.1 release) was barely even usable until SP1, when most of its critical bugs were finally fixed and most vendors had hopped on the bandwagon.

The real shame is that Vista represents nothing more than a &quot;refresh,&quot; really, and not the new paradigm that Microsoft has been promising for so many years.  When feature after feature was deleted in the name of expediency, what we ended up with was a reskinned version of XP with some whizbang toys tied to the front.

I&#039;m a Linux proponent, but I hate &quot;M$ sux hur hur hur&quot; crowing as much as the next person.  However, I think that even though the market might not see it, the technical advantage that Microsoft once enjoyed has been considerably narrowed.  Microsoft hasn&#039;t really added anything to Vista that Linux hasn&#039;t had for years now&#8212;its advantage lies in its significantly larger application pool and mindshare.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s face it:  X.0 releases are never all that great.  XP (ok, so XP was technically an X.1 release) was barely even usable until SP1, when most of its critical bugs were finally fixed and most vendors had hopped on the bandwagon.</p>
<p>The real shame is that Vista represents nothing more than a &#8220;refresh,&#8221; really, and not the new paradigm that Microsoft has been promising for so many years.  When feature after feature was deleted in the name of expediency, what we ended up with was a reskinned version of XP with some whizbang toys tied to the front.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a Linux proponent, but I hate &#8220;M$ sux hur hur hur&#8221; crowing as much as the next person.  However, I think that even though the market might not see it, the technical advantage that Microsoft once enjoyed has been considerably narrowed.  Microsoft hasn&#8217;t really added anything to Vista that Linux hasn&#8217;t had for years now&mdash;its advantage lies in its significantly larger application pool and mindshare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/12/19/do-you-need-windows-vista/#comment-111452</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/12/19/do-you-need-windows-vista/#comment-111452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I _lurve_ Vista. No, really. 

I&#039;ve tried it on my crumbly old laptop, my uber desktop, and my medium Media Center PC, and it&#039;s performed better than XP across the board. It&#039;s pretty, surprisingly functional when you get to grips with it, and features quite a large number of handy features.

Also, it&#039;s difficult to understand how Vista&#039;s compatibility can be knocked, when it&#039;s the vendors themselves that need to produce newer drivers. Given that Vista won&#039;t be available to consumers until the end of January, most vendors won&#039;t have drivers available just yet - why should they?

It seems incredibly fashionable to diss Microsoft - the various Linux distros and OS X versions floating about represent the underdog, and we all know the Internet loves an underdog - but I really wish someone would give them credit where it&#039;s due.

That said, they could release the Home Basic version for virtually nothing, and make their money from upgrades to more fully featured versions; that would give them a tasty slice of positive PR.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I _lurve_ Vista. No, really. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried it on my crumbly old laptop, my uber desktop, and my medium Media Center PC, and it&#8217;s performed better than XP across the board. It&#8217;s pretty, surprisingly functional when you get to grips with it, and features quite a large number of handy features.</p>
<p>Also, it&#8217;s difficult to understand how Vista&#8217;s compatibility can be knocked, when it&#8217;s the vendors themselves that need to produce newer drivers. Given that Vista won&#8217;t be available to consumers until the end of January, most vendors won&#8217;t have drivers available just yet &#8211; why should they?</p>
<p>It seems incredibly fashionable to diss Microsoft &#8211; the various Linux distros and OS X versions floating about represent the underdog, and we all know the Internet loves an underdog &#8211; but I really wish someone would give them credit where it&#8217;s due.</p>
<p>That said, they could release the Home Basic version for virtually nothing, and make their money from upgrades to more fully featured versions; that would give them a tasty slice of positive PR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/12/19/do-you-need-windows-vista/#comment-111451</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/12/19/do-you-need-windows-vista/#comment-111451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkeC7HpsHxo
Doesn&#039;t this say it all???
LOL!!!
I think that Linux will overrun Windows soon...
Many gamers hate Microsoft now because Direct3D 10 will only run with Vista and all new games will be programmed for it. You could call it bullying because it forces all game lovers to invest &gt;250€ (!!!) for a system with a great lack of stability, as we now it from Windows releases in the past. Think of XP when it appeared...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='embed-youtube' style='text-align:center; display: block;'><iframe class='youtube-player' type='text/html' width='640' height='390' src='http://www.youtube.com/embed/IkeC7HpsHxo?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;wmode=transparent' frameborder='0'></iframe></span><br />
Doesn&#8217;t this say it all???<br />
LOL!!!<br />
I think that Linux will overrun Windows soon&#8230;<br />
Many gamers hate Microsoft now because Direct3D 10 will only run with Vista and all new games will be programmed for it. You could call it bullying because it forces all game lovers to invest &gt;250€ (!!!) for a system with a great lack of stability, as we now it from Windows releases in the past. Think of XP when it appeared&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharique</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/12/19/do-you-need-windows-vista/#comment-111426</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharique]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/12/19/do-you-need-windows-vista/#comment-111426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with Bharath. I installed the vista beta 2 on my lenovo laptop. It recognized all the drivers (few of the drivers of xp were also accepted). The improved security and superb graphics are not the only 2 features i like in Vista. But then upgrade from xp to vista in not like xp to win 98!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Bharath. I installed the vista beta 2 on my lenovo laptop. It recognized all the drivers (few of the drivers of xp were also accepted). The improved security and superb graphics are not the only 2 features i like in Vista. But then upgrade from xp to vista in not like xp to win 98!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
