<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google the Brand Name or google the word?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/09/05/google-the-brand-name-or-google-the-word/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/09/05/google-the-brand-name-or-google-the-word/</link>
	<description>Helping you learn more and do more with WordPress</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 03:58:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isaac</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/09/05/google-the-brand-name-or-google-the-word/#comment-156651</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Isaac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 21:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/09/05/google-the-brand-name-or-google-the-word/#comment-156651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember, that to hold a trademark on a name that the company is legally required to defend said trademark.  If they don&#039;t, they will lose it.  These lawyers may be going a little overboard, but you have to draw the line somewhere.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember, that to hold a trademark on a name that the company is legally required to defend said trademark.  If they don&#8217;t, they will lose it.  These lawyers may be going a little overboard, but you have to draw the line somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Using WordPress in Your Domain Name? Don&#8217;t! &#171; Lorelle on WordPress</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/09/05/google-the-brand-name-or-google-the-word/#comment-56569</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Using WordPress in Your Domain Name? Don&#8217;t! &#171; Lorelle on WordPress]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/09/05/google-the-brand-name-or-google-the-word/#comment-56569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The idea that WordPress could become a generic name like Kleenex, Jeep, and Google is exciting to think about. Instead of saying &#8220;I&#8217;m going to blog that&#8221;, you could say &#8220;I&#8217;m going to WordPress that&#8221;. Wow! [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The idea that WordPress could become a generic name like Kleenex, Jeep, and Google is exciting to think about. Instead of saying &#8220;I&#8217;m going to blog that&#8221;, you could say &#8220;I&#8217;m going to WordPress that&#8221;. Wow! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petit</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/09/05/google-the-brand-name-or-google-the-word/#comment-34178</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Petit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 00:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/09/05/google-the-brand-name-or-google-the-word/#comment-34178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really hope some marketing decision makers at Google reads you conclusive article. Their lawyers makes fools of themselves and the company. Not only is it flattering and the best proof of success, when a trademark makes its way into common vocabulary, it is the best of marketing vehicles you can get.

Of course it doesn&#039;t hurt the company or its trade mark. People are not stupid - they know the difference between &quot;to google&quot;, Google, the company and Google, the search engine.

I remember having a vespa, that is a scooter ( google it if you don&#039;t know ), but the brand was Lambretta. Everyone I knew called it a vespa, and Vespa was the more successful Italian scooter manufacturer at the time. Vespa means “wasp” in Italian ( I googled that too - on Google by the way ;), and it&#039;s humming sound and it&#039;s brand didn&#039;t suffer.

Google should fire its lawyers. If the whole buzz is not planned after the principle, that all publicity is good publicity, and the case is dropped as the buzz drops.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hope some marketing decision makers at Google reads you conclusive article. Their lawyers makes fools of themselves and the company. Not only is it flattering and the best proof of success, when a trademark makes its way into common vocabulary, it is the best of marketing vehicles you can get.</p>
<p>Of course it doesn&#8217;t hurt the company or its trade mark. People are not stupid &#8211; they know the difference between &#8220;to google&#8221;, Google, the company and Google, the search engine.</p>
<p>I remember having a vespa, that is a scooter ( google it if you don&#8217;t know ), but the brand was Lambretta. Everyone I knew called it a vespa, and Vespa was the more successful Italian scooter manufacturer at the time. Vespa means “wasp” in Italian ( I googled that too &#8211; on Google by the way <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> , and it&#8217;s humming sound and it&#8217;s brand didn&#8217;t suffer.</p>
<p>Google should fire its lawyers. If the whole buzz is not planned after the principle, that all publicity is good publicity, and the case is dropped as the buzz drops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: myepinoy</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/09/05/google-the-brand-name-or-google-the-word/#comment-34027</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[myepinoy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 09:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/09/05/google-the-brand-name-or-google-the-word/#comment-34027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Google complained about using the whole word, why don&#039;t we drop the &quot;G&quot;. So instead of &quot;i google you.&quot; or &quot;i am googling.&quot;, we can say, &quot;i oogle you.&quot; or &quot;i am oogling.&quot; 

My definition of oogle would be to stare at the computer monitor.

What do you think?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Google complained about using the whole word, why don&#8217;t we drop the &#8220;G&#8221;. So instead of &#8220;i google you.&#8221; or &#8220;i am googling.&#8221;, we can say, &#8220;i oogle you.&#8221; or &#8220;i am oogling.&#8221; </p>
<p>My definition of oogle would be to stare at the computer monitor.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
