<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Testing the Readability of Your Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/07/13/testing-the-readability-of-your-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/07/13/testing-the-readability-of-your-blog/</link>
	<description>Helping you learn more and do more with WordPress</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 11:36:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: strangefruit0000</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/07/13/testing-the-readability-of-your-blog/#comment-912392</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[strangefruit0000]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 22:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/07/13/testing-the-readability-of-your-blog/#comment-912392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My results were:
Summary Value 
Total sentences 379 
Total words 1706 
Average words per Sentence 4.50 
Words with 1 Syllable 900 
Words with 2 Syllables 286 
Words with 3 Syllables 214 
Words with 4 or more Syllables 306 
Percentage of word with three or more syllables 30.48% 
Average Syllables per Word 1.96 
Gunning Fog Index 13.99 
Flesch Reading Ease 36.74 
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 9.25]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My results were:<br />
Summary Value<br />
Total sentences 379<br />
Total words 1706<br />
Average words per Sentence 4.50<br />
Words with 1 Syllable 900<br />
Words with 2 Syllables 286<br />
Words with 3 Syllables 214<br />
Words with 4 or more Syllables 306<br />
Percentage of word with three or more syllables 30.48%<br />
Average Syllables per Word 1.96<br />
Gunning Fog Index 13.99<br />
Flesch Reading Ease 36.74<br />
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 9.25</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorelle VanFossen</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/07/13/testing-the-readability-of-your-blog/#comment-893138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lorelle VanFossen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 06:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/07/13/testing-the-readability-of-your-blog/#comment-893138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@&lt;a href=&quot;http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/07/13/testing-the-readability-of-your-blog/#comment-893091&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; JD from Hoeno&lt;/a&gt;:

It analyzes only the page you give it, not the overall blog content, as far as I remember. I haven&#039;t checked it lately to see if it has been updated with new features.

So did you learn anything?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/07/13/testing-the-readability-of-your-blog/#comment-893091" rel="nofollow"> JD from Hoeno</a>:</p>
<p>It analyzes only the page you give it, not the overall blog content, as far as I remember. I haven&#8217;t checked it lately to see if it has been updated with new features.</p>
<p>So did you learn anything?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD from Hoeno</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/07/13/testing-the-readability-of-your-blog/#comment-893091</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JD from Hoeno]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 22:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/07/13/testing-the-readability-of-your-blog/#comment-893091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A copy of our results:

Readability Results
The following table contains the readability results for my site.

Reading Level Results Summary Value 
Total sentences 2144 
Total words 8507 
Average words per Sentence 3.97 
Words with 1 Syllable 5346 
Words with 2 Syllables 1988 
Words with 3 Syllables 672 
Words with 4 or more Syllables 501 
Percentage of word with three or more syllables 13.79% 
Average Syllables per Word 1.57 
Gunning Fog Index 7.10 
Flesch Reading Ease 70.12 
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 4.46 

I found this very interesting but really don&#039;t know what to make of any of it. I am a little bit skeptical about how they figure the bible, TV guide and Mark Twain have similar readability though. I&#039;ve never been reading a Mark Twain book and thought &#039;&#039;Gaw! This is like reading the bible!&#039;&#039;

Does anybody know if they analyze the homepage on a site but not ALL the pages combined?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A copy of our results:</p>
<p>Readability Results<br />
The following table contains the readability results for my site.</p>
<p>Reading Level Results Summary Value<br />
Total sentences 2144<br />
Total words 8507<br />
Average words per Sentence 3.97<br />
Words with 1 Syllable 5346<br />
Words with 2 Syllables 1988<br />
Words with 3 Syllables 672<br />
Words with 4 or more Syllables 501<br />
Percentage of word with three or more syllables 13.79%<br />
Average Syllables per Word 1.57<br />
Gunning Fog Index 7.10<br />
Flesch Reading Ease 70.12<br />
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 4.46 </p>
<p>I found this very interesting but really don&#8217;t know what to make of any of it. I am a little bit skeptical about how they figure the bible, TV guide and Mark Twain have similar readability though. I&#8217;ve never been reading a Mark Twain book and thought &#8221;Gaw! This is like reading the bible!&#8221;</p>
<p>Does anybody know if they analyze the homepage on a site but not ALL the pages combined?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorelle VanFossen</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/07/13/testing-the-readability-of-your-blog/#comment-889334</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lorelle VanFossen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 05:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/07/13/testing-the-readability-of-your-blog/#comment-889334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@&lt;a href=&quot;http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/07/13/testing-the-readability-of-your-blog/#comment-889328&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; stokem228&lt;/a&gt;:

Yes, I&#039;m a teacher of adults. Congratulations on your new blog. And thank your teacher for sharing my blog with you and your fellow students.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/07/13/testing-the-readability-of-your-blog/#comment-889328" rel="nofollow"> stokem228</a>:</p>
<p>Yes, I&#8217;m a teacher of adults. Congratulations on your new blog. And thank your teacher for sharing my blog with you and your fellow students.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stokem228</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/07/13/testing-the-readability-of-your-blog/#comment-889328</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stokem228]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 03:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/07/13/testing-the-readability-of-your-blog/#comment-889328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aren&#039;t you a teacher? My teacher Mr. Saner, showed us your blog. I just started one, stokem228.wordpress.com Anyway I googled for mine and I got yours.
P.S. liked the part about a rat&#039;s ass.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t you a teacher? My teacher Mr. Saner, showed us your blog. I just started one, stokem228.wordpress.com Anyway I googled for mine and I got yours.<br />
P.S. liked the part about a rat&#8217;s ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dannyman</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/07/13/testing-the-readability-of-your-blog/#comment-397709</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dannyman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 18:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/07/13/testing-the-readability-of-your-blog/#comment-397709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aye.  I&#039;ll second dana&#039;s comment about the Word Statistics Plugin.  I actually found this article while Googling for said plugin. ;)

-danny]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aye.  I&#8217;ll second dana&#8217;s comment about the Word Statistics Plugin.  I actually found this article while Googling for said plugin. <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>-danny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tapera &#187; readability tests</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/07/13/testing-the-readability-of-your-blog/#comment-38378</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tapera &#187; readability tests]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 13:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/07/13/testing-the-readability-of-your-blog/#comment-38378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Los test de legibilidad (readability test) tienen audiencia, aunque no muy nutrida. Consultando alguna de estás páginas, acá, aquí, acullá, se puede indagar un poco en los algoritmos que tomando como puntos de partida variables sintácticas nos indican el grado de dificultad de un texto. Desde el sitio Juicy Studio se pueden conocer tres indicadores (el Gunning-Fog, el Flesch Reading Ease y el Flesch-Kincaid grade level) para evaluar un determinado sitio web o blog con sólo poner su DNS. Como bien se dice en La bitácora del Tigre -que presenta en ese mismo post el plugin de legibilidad para Wordpress)- algunos de esos índices no fueron concebidos para el idioma español, aunque la mayoría insista en aceptar su pertinencia para varios idiomas. Aunque estas fórmulas puedan disparar la imaginación de muchos analistas, en general sus usos son complementados por herramientas contextuales para la producción de sentido: dos textos igual de legibles no serán igual de comprensibles, por muchas razones. Sin embargo, a los fines de la producción de contenido estos indicadores pueden adaptarse a los objetivos deseados. (Aunque tal vez eso no sea un algoritmo sino el uso &#8220;oblicuo&#8221; de uno.) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Los test de legibilidad (readability test) tienen audiencia, aunque no muy nutrida. Consultando alguna de estás páginas, acá, aquí, acullá, se puede indagar un poco en los algoritmos que tomando como puntos de partida variables sintácticas nos indican el grado de dificultad de un texto. Desde el sitio Juicy Studio se pueden conocer tres indicadores (el Gunning-Fog, el Flesch Reading Ease y el Flesch-Kincaid grade level) para evaluar un determinado sitio web o blog con sólo poner su DNS. Como bien se dice en La bitácora del Tigre -que presenta en ese mismo post el plugin de legibilidad para WordPress)- algunos de esos índices no fueron concebidos para el idioma español, aunque la mayoría insista en aceptar su pertinencia para varios idiomas. Aunque estas fórmulas puedan disparar la imaginación de muchos analistas, en general sus usos son complementados por herramientas contextuales para la producción de sentido: dos textos igual de legibles no serán igual de comprensibles, por muchas razones. Sin embargo, a los fines de la producción de contenido estos indicadores pueden adaptarse a los objetivos deseados. (Aunque tal vez eso no sea un algoritmo sino el uso &#8220;oblicuo&#8221; de uno.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorelle VanFossen</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/07/13/testing-the-readability-of-your-blog/#comment-24692</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lorelle VanFossen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/07/13/testing-the-readability-of-your-blog/#comment-24692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andyp: I used it in Firefox, as do a lot of other people. Check your WordPress Theme to see if there is an error there and report it through Feedback so it can get fixed. That will help everyone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andyp: I used it in Firefox, as do a lot of other people. Check your WordPress Theme to see if there is an error there and report it through Feedback so it can get fixed. That will help everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mirkwood</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/07/13/testing-the-readability-of-your-blog/#comment-24667</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mirkwood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/07/13/testing-the-readability-of-your-blog/#comment-24667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;A Readability Test&lt;/strong&gt;

Lorelle points to an interesting website called Juicy Studio, which has a facility for testing the readability of an electronic document. The main outputs of the test are three scores:

Gunning-Fog Index: Years of schooling needed to understand the tex...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A Readability Test</strong></p>
<p>Lorelle points to an interesting website called Juicy Studio, which has a facility for testing the readability of an electronic document. The main outputs of the test are three scores:</p>
<p>Gunning-Fog Index: Years of schooling needed to understand the tex&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andyp</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/07/13/testing-the-readability-of-your-blog/#comment-24659</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[andyp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 08:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lorelle.wordpress.com/2006/07/13/testing-the-readability-of-your-blog/#comment-24659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm - the tester page won&#039;t load in Firefox due to a not well-formed XML error. Oh well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm &#8211; the tester page won&#8217;t load in Firefox due to a not well-formed XML error. Oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
