<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Writing With Culture - The Insidious Pull of Pop Language</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2005/12/09/writing-with-culture-the-insidious-pull-of-pop-language/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2005/12/09/writing-with-culture-the-insidious-pull-of-pop-language/</link>
	<description>Helping you learn more and do more with WordPress</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Supaproofread&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Language of Pop Culture - Should You Use Proper English Only?</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2005/12/09/writing-with-culture-the-insidious-pull-of-pop-language/#comment-803590</link>
		<dc:creator>Supaproofread&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Language of Pop Culture - Should You Use Proper English Only?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2005/12/07/writing-with-culture-the-insidious-pull-of-pop-language/#comment-803590</guid>
		<description>[...] is a comment reproduced from JTony on Lorelle Van Fossen&#8217;s Wordpress blogging blog:  &#8220;The tyrrany of language academicians [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a comment reproduced from JTony on Lorelle Van Fossen&#8217;s WordPress blogging blog:  &#8220;The tyrrany of language academicians [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorelle on WordPress &#187; The 12 Biggest Problems With Your Blogs</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2005/12/09/writing-with-culture-the-insidious-pull-of-pop-language/#comment-2832</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorelle on WordPress &#187; The 12 Biggest Problems With Your Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 03:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2005/12/07/writing-with-culture-the-insidious-pull-of-pop-language/#comment-2832</guid>
		<description>[...] Eye R a Gr8 Blogger: Cutesy shortcuts in the language and Leet Speak is fine for children, but obnoxious for anyone who somehow graduated from high school. Stop it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Eye R a Gr8 Blogger: Cutesy shortcuts in the language and Leet Speak is fine for children, but obnoxious for anyone who somehow graduated from high school. Stop it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forest</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2005/12/09/writing-with-culture-the-insidious-pull-of-pop-language/#comment-990</link>
		<dc:creator>Forest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 21:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2005/12/07/writing-with-culture-the-insidious-pull-of-pop-language/#comment-990</guid>
		<description>If you want that you understood more people, you should write understandable</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want that you understood more people, you should write understandable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JTony</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2005/12/09/writing-with-culture-the-insidious-pull-of-pop-language/#comment-974</link>
		<dc:creator>JTony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 20:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2005/12/07/writing-with-culture-the-insidious-pull-of-pop-language/#comment-974</guid>
		<description>The tyrrany of language academicians is a constant thorn in the side of those who wish to communicate. Language is fluid, changing and evolving faster than any virus. Trying to keep language still is like trying to hold on to a single spot on a river... it cannot be done.

The rule should be that if your intended audience can understand what you are writing, then you have accomplished what you need to. The only time you should avoid any form of "everyday speech" or "jargon" or anything else is if it is something your intended audience will not understand.  It is all about the context of your readers, and nothing else applies. 

As far as writing intended for a "general audience" how can it be that a general audience won't understand "everyday speech". It seems to me that the language that speaks to people is the language that they speak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tyrrany of language academicians is a constant thorn in the side of those who wish to communicate. Language is fluid, changing and evolving faster than any virus. Trying to keep language still is like trying to hold on to a single spot on a river&#8230; it cannot be done.</p>
<p>The rule should be that if your intended audience can understand what you are writing, then you have accomplished what you need to. The only time you should avoid any form of &#8220;everyday speech&#8221; or &#8220;jargon&#8221; or anything else is if it is something your intended audience will not understand.  It is all about the context of your readers, and nothing else applies. </p>
<p>As far as writing intended for a &#8220;general audience&#8221; how can it be that a general audience won&#8217;t understand &#8220;everyday speech&#8221;. It seems to me that the language that speaks to people is the language that they speak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
