<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress Beta 1 for WordPress 1.6 Released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2005/11/19/wordpress-beta-1-for-wordpress-16-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2005/11/19/wordpress-beta-1-for-wordpress-16-released/</link>
	<description>Helping you learn more and do more with WordPress</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:12:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Planet WordPress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WordPress 2.0 Release Candidates</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2005/11/19/wordpress-beta-1-for-wordpress-16-released/#comment-1940</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Planet WordPress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WordPress 2.0 Release Candidates]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2005/11/19/wordpress-beta-1-for-wordpress-16-released/#comment-1940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] As has been mentioned elsewhere, WordPress 2.0 is in beta. We&#8217;ve kept it low key so far, but we&#8217;re getting a pretty good testing turn out nonetheless. Several little bugs have been shaken out since the first beta. If you are feeling adventurous, try it and share your beta experience in the Beta Forum or on the Testers List. As always with unreleased versions, don&#8217;t use it on your live site just yet. If you do, make a backup and be ready to rollback. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As has been mentioned elsewhere, WordPress 2.0 is in beta. We&#8217;ve kept it low key so far, but we&#8217;re getting a pretty good testing turn out nonetheless. Several little bugs have been shaken out since the first beta. If you are feeling adventurous, try it and share your beta experience in the Beta Forum or on the Testers List. As always with unreleased versions, don&#8217;t use it on your live site just yet. If you do, make a backup and be ready to rollback. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Andy Site &#187; Blog Archive &#187; test</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2005/11/19/wordpress-beta-1-for-wordpress-16-released/#comment-936</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Andy Site &#187; Blog Archive &#187; test]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 10:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2005/11/19/wordpress-beta-1-for-wordpress-16-released/#comment-936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] As has been mentioned elsewhere, WordPress 2.0 is in beta. We&#8217;ve kept it low key so far, but we&#8217;re getting a pretty good testing turn out nonetheless. Several little bugs have been shaken out since the first beta. If you are feeling adventurous, try it and share your beta experience in the Beta Forum or on the Testers List. As always with unreleased versions, don&#8217;t use it on your live site just yet. If you do, make a backup and be ready to rollback. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As has been mentioned elsewhere, WordPress 2.0 is in beta. We&#8217;ve kept it low key so far, but we&#8217;re getting a pretty good testing turn out nonetheless. Several little bugs have been shaken out since the first beta. If you are feeling adventurous, try it and share your beta experience in the Beta Forum or on the Testers List. As always with unreleased versions, don&#8217;t use it on your live site just yet. If you do, make a backup and be ready to rollback. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan on WordPress &#187; WordPress 2.0 Release Candidates</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2005/11/19/wordpress-beta-1-for-wordpress-16-released/#comment-889</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan on WordPress &#187; WordPress 2.0 Release Candidates]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 22:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2005/11/19/wordpress-beta-1-for-wordpress-16-released/#comment-889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] As has been mentioned elsewhere, WordPress 2.0 is in beta. We&#8217;ve kept it low key so far, but we&#8217;re getting a pretty good testing turn out nonetheless. Several little bugs have been shaken out since the first beta. If you are feeling adventurous, try it and share your beta experience in the Beta Forum or on the Testers List. As always with unreleased versions, don&#8217;t use it on your live site just yet. If you do, make a backup and be ready to rollback. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As has been mentioned elsewhere, WordPress 2.0 is in beta. We&#8217;ve kept it low key so far, but we&#8217;re getting a pretty good testing turn out nonetheless. Several little bugs have been shaken out since the first beta. If you are feeling adventurous, try it and share your beta experience in the Beta Forum or on the Testers List. As always with unreleased versions, don&#8217;t use it on your live site just yet. If you do, make a backup and be ready to rollback. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
