<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 5 Web Myths</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2005/10/17/top-5-web-myths/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2005/10/17/top-5-web-myths/</link>
	<description>Helping you learn more and do more with WordPress</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:48:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2005/10/17/top-5-web-myths/#comment-435815</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wayne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2005/10/17/top-5-web-myths/#comment-435815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is simple but deep. The more I think about it, the more sense it makes.

Thanks, Lorelle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is simple but deep. The more I think about it, the more sense it makes.</p>
<p>Thanks, Lorelle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorelle VanFossen</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2005/10/17/top-5-web-myths/#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lorelle VanFossen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2005/10/17/top-5-web-myths/#comment-362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seen by users? You&#039;re right that it could be the most beautiful design in the world, but if there is nothing for search engines to gather into their database, including words, specifically keywords, then your site will never be seen.

Pretty is only CSS deep. Beauty to search engines gets you found. Which is why I loved the analogy of making furniture. The design is varnish, and the content is wood. Which came first? The wood or the varnish. 

The wood consists of content, content, content.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seen by users? You&#8217;re right that it could be the most beautiful design in the world, but if there is nothing for search engines to gather into their database, including words, specifically keywords, then your site will never be seen.</p>
<p>Pretty is only CSS deep. Beauty to search engines gets you found. Which is why I loved the analogy of making furniture. The design is varnish, and the content is wood. Which came first? The wood or the varnish. </p>
<p>The wood consists of content, content, content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExcitedEYE</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2005/10/17/top-5-web-myths/#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ExcitedEYE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 23:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2005/10/17/top-5-web-myths/#comment-357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you don&#039;t think that the main and primary task of building a web site is creating something that get seen by users?  you can design yourself silly, but if nobody sees it, what&#039;s the use?  It could be the Picasso of web design but if it&#039;s locked in a dark closet nobody can appreciate it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you don&#8217;t think that the main and primary task of building a web site is creating something that get seen by users?  you can design yourself silly, but if nobody sees it, what&#8217;s the use?  It could be the Picasso of web design but if it&#8217;s locked in a dark closet nobody can appreciate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
