<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Growing Up With WordPress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2005/08/24/growing-up-with-wordpress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2005/08/24/growing-up-with-wordpress/</link>
	<description>Helping you learn more and do more with WordPress</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://lorelle.wordpress.com/2005/08/24/growing-up-with-wordpress/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 18:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lorelle.wordpress.com/?p=25#comment-23</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;WordPress.com as Gateway Drug&lt;/strong&gt;

	I&#8217;ve recently been wondering about the limitations of WordPress.com compared with one&#8217;s own installation of WordPress. I was thinking about these limitations as bad things, and in a sense they are. 
	But then I read Lorelle quoting Ken, an...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>WordPress.com as Gateway Drug</strong></p>
<p>	I&#8217;ve recently been wondering about the limitations of WordPress.com compared with one&#8217;s own installation of WordPress. I was thinking about these limitations as bad things, and in a sense they are.<br />
	But then I read Lorelle quoting Ken, an&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
